2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.03.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium carbonate fouling on double-pipe heat exchanger with different heat exchanging surfaces

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greenish brash oxide was not visible in these test series unlike in Teng et al. [24]. In the images of the brass bolt (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Greenish brash oxide was not visible in these test series unlike in Teng et al. [24]. In the images of the brass bolt (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The predictions were obtained for k sl =0.3, 0.6 and 1.0 W/m/K, while the other parameters were the same as listed in this section, except for T m,i =57 o C and T a =40 o C. All the resulting graphs shown in Fig. 3 have one point in common, namely the point corresponding to the zerothickness of the sludge layers, which occurs at about T m,o =46.16 o C. The sludge on the exchanger walls is an additional thermal resistance, which results in a lower heat exchange and an increase in the return temperature from the heat exchanger [20][21][22]. The increase in the value of the heat transfer coefficient of the sludge, which depends on the type of substrate, causes an increase in heat exchange and a drop in the return temperature from the heat exchanger.…”
Section: Experimental Data and Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Where v represents the scale inhibition rate; 1 , 2 is the scale thickness of heat exchanger A and scale thickness of heat exchanger B, respectively. Fouling resistance R f (m 2 KW -1 )on the surface of the plate heat exchanger, which can be defined as formula (7) [24][25] :…”
Section: Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale species differs from depending on the treatment method and mineral content of the utilized water. Among them, the most common mineral ions are Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ [2] . When the hard water flows through the heat transfer equipment, these ions and bicarbonate ions precipitate due to changes in pressure and solubility,, eventually forming mineral deposits(limescale) on the heat transfer surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%