2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium-dependent docking of synaptic vesicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact geometric arrangement of replacement SVs and docked SVs is still uncertain (review: ref. 55 ), making the position of IP vesicles also uncertain. If replacement SVs are located in a second row of SVs, behind docked SVs, IP vesicles would be placed further back, at a distance of >80 nm from release sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact geometric arrangement of replacement SVs and docked SVs is still uncertain (review: ref. 55 ), making the position of IP vesicles also uncertain. If replacement SVs are located in a second row of SVs, behind docked SVs, IP vesicles would be placed further back, at a distance of >80 nm from release sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If replacement SVs are located in a second row of SVs, behind docked SVs, IP vesicles would be placed further back, at a distance of >80 nm from release sites. If, however, replacement and docked SVs are all located within the first row of SVs above the plasma membrane, as suggested by the “two-state model” ( 26 ), IP vesicles would correspond to the second row of vesicles and could be attached to the plasma membrane by Munc13 links ( 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion of vesicles with other lipid bilayers is essential for intracellular trafficking and release of neurotransmitters and hormones [1][2][3][4]. Release of neurotransmitters and hormones involves the active transport of the vesicles using cytoskeletal elements such as F-actin and microtubules [5,6], tethering and docking of the vesicles with the target membrane [7,8], and finally calcium-induced fusion of the membranes, resulting in the release of vesicular contents to the extracellular media via exocytosis [9,10].…”
Section: Lipids and Exocytosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the way sphingolipids affect the secretory process, it is important to appreciate that this is a multi-step process starting with the translocation of the vesicles to the plasma membrane using active transport involving cytoskeletal elements [43,44], maturation of the docked vesicles to be competent for membrane fusion [8,45], and finally the fusion process itself that includes the opening of a fusion pore, subsequent dilation, and then the release of active substances that ends in full collapse of the vesicle into the plasma membrane [46][47][48] (Figure 2). Therefore, the use of biophysical techniques such as membrane capacitance methods [49,50], and amperometry [51,52], which resolve distinct stages of exocytosis, is essential for better understanding how sphingolipids alter the secretory pathway.…”
Section: Sphingolipids Alter the Single Fusion Properties Of Neurotransmitter Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SV fusion is coupled to presynaptic elevations of Ca 2+ concentration by the vesicular Ca 2+ sensor synaptotagmin (syt) which interacts with the SNAREs (Brewer et al, 2015; Littleton et al, 1993; Mohrmann et al, 2013; Schupp et al, 2016; Zhou et al, 2015; Zhou et al, 2017). Besides a role in fusion, both the SNARE complex and syt are involved in docking and priming of SVs (Chen et al, 2021; Imig et al, 2014; Neher and Brose, 2018; Silva et al, 2021; Walter et al, 2010; Weber et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%