2016
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium hydroxide as a processing base in alkali‐aided pH‐shift protein recovery process

Abstract: Results of our study showed that protein solubility was increased and the recovered protein had significantly more calcium when Ca(OH) was used as the processing base. Results showed both NaOH and Ca(OH) to be an effective processing base for pH-shift protein recovery processes. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 3, using NaOH had higher protein content (C: 51.46%), protein recovery (C: 22.99%) from acidic precipitates, and total recovery (C: 88.51%) than using Ca(OH) 2, which had protein content (F: 40.83%), protein recovery (F: 16.4%) from precipitates, and total recovery (F: 75.91%). These results were consistent with a previous observation (Paker, et al, 2017). In their study, the protein solubility was greater when Ca (OH) 2 was used compared to NaOH; also, using Ca(OH) 2 as the processing base yielded the greatest lipid recovery (p < 0.05) at 77 g 100 g -1 , whereas the greatest protein recovery (p < 0.05) was recorded as 53 g 100 g -1 protein using NaOH.…”
Section: Naoh Versus Ca(oh)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In Table 3, using NaOH had higher protein content (C: 51.46%), protein recovery (C: 22.99%) from acidic precipitates, and total recovery (C: 88.51%) than using Ca(OH) 2, which had protein content (F: 40.83%), protein recovery (F: 16.4%) from precipitates, and total recovery (F: 75.91%). These results were consistent with a previous observation (Paker, et al, 2017). In their study, the protein solubility was greater when Ca (OH) 2 was used compared to NaOH; also, using Ca(OH) 2 as the processing base yielded the greatest lipid recovery (p < 0.05) at 77 g 100 g -1 , whereas the greatest protein recovery (p < 0.05) was recorded as 53 g 100 g -1 protein using NaOH.…”
Section: Naoh Versus Ca(oh)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Protein was extracted from the walnut using the alkali‐aided pH‐shift method, which was the supernatant from the NaOH extract after the precipitation of proteins with HCl (Paker et al, 2017). The optimum parameters of protein extraction were obtained from walnuts by the method of single‐factor test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foaming time increased with the increase in pH, whereas the time of the disappearance of foams decreased with the increase in pH (Table 2). As far as we know, protein solubility is closely associated with the pH in solution [42]. We speculated that the proteins in CSL decreased with the increase in pH because of the protein deposition, thus limiting the formation of foams.…”
Section: The Effects Of the Mode Of Corn Steep Liquor Feeding On Ferm...mentioning
confidence: 98%