1976
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/21/1/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculated beta-ray dose factors for trabecular bone

Abstract: Mean dose factors have been calculated for those tissues in bone that are relevant to the induction of late irradiation effects; namely, red bone marrow and endosteal tissues lining trabecular bone surfaces. The calculations are based on a Monte Carlo computer method for beta-emitting radionuclides which are distributed uniformly throughout the volume of mineralized bone. Results are given for the radionuclides 14C, 45Ca, 22Na, 18F, 32P, 90Y and 90Sr+90Y (all considered for this purpose as volume-seekers) for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Monte Carlo method of calculating /^-particle dose factors in trabecular bone (Whitwell & Spiers, 1976) has overcome the principal difficulties of bone dosimetry referred to in the introduction. The method is based on a quantitative description of trabecular structure as an omni-directional distribution of path lengths through the marrow spaces and through the trabeculae and this avoids assumptions of simple geometrical shapes for cavities in what is essentially an "irregular" assemblage of cavities and trabeculae.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Theoretical Dose Enhancement In Experimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Monte Carlo method of calculating /^-particle dose factors in trabecular bone (Whitwell & Spiers, 1976) has overcome the principal difficulties of bone dosimetry referred to in the introduction. The method is based on a quantitative description of trabecular structure as an omni-directional distribution of path lengths through the marrow spaces and through the trabeculae and this avoids assumptions of simple geometrical shapes for cavities in what is essentially an "irregular" assemblage of cavities and trabeculae.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Theoretical Dose Enhancement In Experimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spiers and his students at the University of Leeds in the late 1960's to late 1970's (Spiers 1966;Spiers et al 1978Spiers et al , 1981. The Leeds research group developed a novel optical scanning system from which chord-length distributions were acquired in the lumbar vertebrae for several subjects, as well as at several skeletal sites of a 1.7-y-old child (5 sites), a 9-y-old child (5 sites), and a 44-y-old male (7 sites) (Beddoe 1976;Beddoe et al 1976;Whitwell 1973;Whitwell and Spiers 1976). These chord-length distributions were used by Whitwell to derive dose factors (marrow and endosteal doses per unit skeletal activity burden) for several radionuclides of interest in radiation protection (Whitwell 1973;Whitwell and Spiers 1976).…”
Section: Icrp Skeletal Model For the Adult Male Radiation Workermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent calculations of the energy deposition in the endosteal layer of trabecular bone (Eckerman, in preparation) indicates that in the earlier work of Whitwell and Spiers (1976) the energy deposition was underestimated. In their study, the assumption had to be made that the energy deposited per beta particle traversing the endosteal region was the same as the energy deposited by a particle traversing an average path through the region.…”
Section: \ U1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these data and Monte Carlo sampling techniques, the flight of beta particles can be simulated, as outlined above. The results of such calculations by Whitwell and Spiers (1976) are shown in Table A-1 along with the discriptive parameters for the various bones.…”
Section: As Estimation Of Energy Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%