1989
DOI: 10.1016/0092-640x(89)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculated differential secondary-particle production cross sections after nonelastic neutron interactions with carbon and oxygen between 15 and 60 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, following preequilibrium emission of a particle other than a neutron, 3a break-up cannot occur. Our results support Brenner and Prael's view [41] that the ENDF/B-V evaluated alpha production at 20 MeV is too high.…”
Section: Inclusive Production Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, following preequilibrium emission of a particle other than a neutron, 3a break-up cannot occur. Our results support Brenner and Prael's view [41] that the ENDF/B-V evaluated alpha production at 20 MeV is too high.…”
Section: Inclusive Production Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The good agreement that is seen between our calculations and the measurements is important since this reaction channel makes up such a large fraction of the total nonelastic cross section. Our calculation of this channel agrees with the data better than that of Brenner and Prael [41], which lies below the measurements. This is the main reason for the fact that our total nonelastic cross section at 20 MeV is 7 % higher than Brenner and Prael's [41].…”
Section: Comparison With (N N'3a) Measurementssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Incident energies of 27 MeV (lst row), 40 MeV (2nd row), 60 MeV (third row), and 70 MeV (fourth row) are shown. The solid line shows the evaluated result [12] from GNASH model calculations transformed into the laboratory frame of reference; the dashed line shows the results from Brenner and Prael's calculations [38]. It is evident that the evaluated result is in good agreement with the experimental data [17,[19][20][21], with the exception of the 70 MeV proton production where the calculation underpredicts the measurement.…”
Section: A Neutron Cross Sections and Kerma Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 75%