2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.831302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating BRDFs from surface PSDs for moderately rough optical surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(22) approaches zero whereas the GHS Smooth obliquity factor in the denominator of Eqs. (23) does not.…”
Section: Inverse Scattering Problem: Predicting Surface Psds From Brdmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(22) approaches zero whereas the GHS Smooth obliquity factor in the denominator of Eqs. (23) does not.…”
Section: Inverse Scattering Problem: Predicting Surface Psds From Brdmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(9), then calculate the BRDF one point at an time by choosing an incident and a scattering angle, then implementing the FFTLog numerical Fourier transform algorithm [16,30] indicated symbolically in Eq. (14) below .…”
Section: Surface Scatter Effects At Suvi Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have fit the measured metrology data with an ABC or K-Correlation Function of the following form [29][30] .…”
Section: Surface Scatter Effects At Suvi Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be easily checked that in the BSDF from reference [3], proper normalization is not automatically achieved. Finally, the K-correlation model [15,16] is a physically-based BSDF obtained by inserting an analytical parametrization of the power spectral density (PSD) into the Rayleigh-Rice equation [10,16]. As can be checked numerically, this model is inherently normalized to the correct TIS.…”
Section: Roughness Of Optical Surfaces: Overview Of Existing Bsdf mentioning
confidence: 99%