2022
DOI: 10.3390/math10121960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating Column Separation in Liquid Pipelines Using a 1D-CFD Coupled Model

Abstract: This paper proposes a coupled 1D-CFD model for calculating column separation in liquid pipelines. ANSYS Fluent is utilized to calculate two-phase flow analysis. Method of Characteristics and Discrete Gas Cavity Model (DGCM) are both employed to conduct 1D transient analysis. The results show that the proposed model, with both 2D and 3D CFD analysis, captures the transient responses of the system that have nearly identical accuracy and are both consistent with the results of a physical experiment. The results o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise modeling and simulation of the three-dimensional flow field in the whole pipeline is practically impossible and unnecessary. Instead, the dynamic distribution of air pressure and flow rate along the pipeline axis i often of greater interest [40]. Therefore, a one-dimensional flow model is established to describe the system-level behaviors in PCPs in this work.…”
Section: Air Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise modeling and simulation of the three-dimensional flow field in the whole pipeline is practically impossible and unnecessary. Instead, the dynamic distribution of air pressure and flow rate along the pipeline axis i often of greater interest [40]. Therefore, a one-dimensional flow model is established to describe the system-level behaviors in PCPs in this work.…”
Section: Air Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergant et al [1] reviewed the historical development of column separation. In most cases, mathematical and numerical models (e.g., the discrete vapor cavity model and discrete gas cavity model, which were solved using different numerical methods [2][3][4][5], two-phase flow models [6,7], interface models [8,9], CFD approach [10][11][12], etc.) have been discussed, but little information on experiments and experimental data has been published, especially in cases when column separation occurs due to the rapid closure of a valve at the downstream end of the pipeline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mousavifard et al [18] proposed to use semi-2D and 1D models to calculate the change of cavitation volume. Khani et al [19] used the CFD model to simulate the change of cavitation volume with time during the hydraulic shock process of an inclined copper pipeline with a length of 37.2 m and a diameter of 22 mm, and obtained the change of cavitation volume in the inclined pipeline at different times. In order to predict more accurately the pressure transients accompanying air release and vaporous cavitation inside oil-hydraulic low pressure pipelines, Dan Jiang [20] proposed a new method for parameter identification using genetic algorithms (GA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%