2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating local geomembrane strains from a single gravel particle with thin plate theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marcotte and Fleming (2021) directly measured strains on a white geomembrane by observing the deformation of a grid pattern on the bottom of the geomembrane while maintaining the deformed shape in place using epoxy resin. The results agreed with the general trend of the finite element modelling by Eldesouky and Brachman (2018). An empirical relationship was developed to "correct" the estimated strains calculated using the Tognon et al (2000) method and the resulting "corrected Tognon method" better predicted the location and magnitude of geomembrane strains when compared to the measured grid (Marcotte and Fleming 2021).…”
Section: Background On Geomembrane Strainsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Marcotte and Fleming (2021) directly measured strains on a white geomembrane by observing the deformation of a grid pattern on the bottom of the geomembrane while maintaining the deformed shape in place using epoxy resin. The results agreed with the general trend of the finite element modelling by Eldesouky and Brachman (2018). An empirical relationship was developed to "correct" the estimated strains calculated using the Tognon et al (2000) method and the resulting "corrected Tognon method" better predicted the location and magnitude of geomembrane strains when compared to the measured grid (Marcotte and Fleming 2021).…”
Section: Background On Geomembrane Strainsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The method advocated by Tognon et al (2000) is based on a combination of membrane and bending theory, and has been shown to be most reliable (Rowe & Yu 2019). Although the method advocated by Eldesouky and Brachman (2018) shows promise and is of significant value in that it acknowledges the increased strain effect due to aggregate rotation on slopes. Rowe & Yu (2019) show that under particular loading conditions, the geomembrane peak tensile strain is related to particle size, with 16% strain for a 25 mm particle and 32% for a 50 mm particle above the geomembrane without protection layer.…”
Section: Perceived Performance Of Geotextile Cushion Layers Above Geomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GMBs used in TSF are usually either high-density (HDPE) or linear low-density (LLDPE) polyethylene with a typical thickness of 1.0 to 2.5 mm [5,8]. With a GMB liner at the base of a TSF impoundment, the leakage is effectively limited to flow through GMB defects that commonly arise either during construction or subsequently due to longterm stress cracking [10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. A geosynthetic liner leakage simulator (GLLS) was developed by Brachman et al (2017) [34] to study the leakage through a circular GMB hole in tailings storage applications under simulated field conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%