2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-018-2092-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating the motion of highly confined, arbitrary-shaped particles in Hele–Shaw channels

Abstract: We combine theory and numerical calculations to accurately predict the motion of anisotropic particles in shallow microfluidic channels, in which the particles are strongly confined in the vertical direction. We formulate an effective quasi-two-dimensional description of the Stokes flow around the particle via the Brinkman equation, which can be solved in a time that is two orders of magnitude faster than the three-dimensional problem. The computational speedup enables us to calculate the full trajectories of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have fitted the analytical curves on our data set, where the fitting parameter is the reorientation relaxation timeτ. We find that this parameter is a monotonically decreasing function of R. We stress that this result is not in contradiction with recent work where the relaxation time shows a minimum forR = 1.9 23 , since their model of dumbbell particle is fundamentally different from our model. In our model we increaseR by decreasing the radius of one sphere, leading to a particle composed of two beads for allR.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have fitted the analytical curves on our data set, where the fitting parameter is the reorientation relaxation timeτ. We find that this parameter is a monotonically decreasing function of R. We stress that this result is not in contradiction with recent work where the relaxation time shows a minimum forR = 1.9 23 , since their model of dumbbell particle is fundamentally different from our model. In our model we increaseR by decreasing the radius of one sphere, leading to a particle composed of two beads for allR.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Engineering particle trajectories in a device is now possible in three different ways, by means of external fields 11 , by taking advantage of hydrodynamic interactions in laminar flows, or by exploiting inertial effects in flow drag of finite Reynolds numbers 12 . The latter has been achieved with recent studies on flow sculpting [13][14][15] , while hydrodynamic interactions are exploited in laminar flows by engineering the geometry of the channel [16][17][18][19][20] or, alternatively, the shape of the sus- pended particles [21][22][23] . This work is concerned with the last of these and specifically with dumbbell shaped particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To distinguish this drag from the drag due to the in-plane flow around the particle, we dub these two interactions “friction” and “flow” drag, respectively. Due to the strong particle confinement the velocity profile in the gaps is close to linear ( 38 , 52 ), allowing us to assume Couette flow in the gaps ( Fig. 1 F ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%