2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3030771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating Trade in Value Added

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent withTaglioni and Winkler (2016) who worked with TiVA OECD andAslam et al (2017) who used data from EORA.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consistent withTaglioni and Winkler (2016) who worked with TiVA OECD andAslam et al (2017) who used data from EORA.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…We built a panel from 1995 to 2015, with data from a multiregional input‐output model EORA (Lenzen, 2013) data, which incorporates the input‐output country and industry‐level relations. The computation of trade in value‐added measures was obtained according to the procedures of Aslam et al (2017), which intuitively rely on the value‐added trade from EORA. The panel includes 161 countries, of which 20 are from LA (the country list is available in Appendix A1).…”
Section: Data and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With 26 sectors, Eora provides a relatively detailed sectoral classification and is consistent across all countries covered. The methodology follows the decomposition of trade in value-added based on the Leontief inverse as set in Aslam, Novta, & Rodrigues-Bastos (2017). Gross export value was divided into domestic origin value-added, regional value-added (aggregated for five Central Asian countries), and value-added from other countries (all countries outside the focus region).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure3compare the host countries' fixed effects and their effects on logistics performance, with a focus on the overall LPI during the period average of2007-2017 of Table6displays the coefficients of the host countries' fixed effects in Column (ii) (PPML estimation) in Table6. Column (b) shows the period averaged LPIs of the host countries, and Column (c) computes their LPI deviations from the average LPI of the benchmark countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%