2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation and analysis of the mobility and diffusion coefficient of thermal electrons in methane/air premixed flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ion transport is modeled according to a mixture-average approach with potentials adequate for charged species [7]. The mobility of the electron is constant and equal to µ e = 0.4 m 2 V −1 s −1 [17]. Einstein's rela-tion is used to obtain diffusion coefficients from mobilities and vice versa.…”
Section: Configuration Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ion transport is modeled according to a mixture-average approach with potentials adequate for charged species [7]. The mobility of the electron is constant and equal to µ e = 0.4 m 2 V −1 s −1 [17]. Einstein's rela-tion is used to obtain diffusion coefficients from mobilities and vice versa.…”
Section: Configuration Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4). In reality, while µ − = µ e ≈ const in the burnt gases [17], the cation mobility µ + does vary significantly across the preheat zone ahead of the flame.…”
Section: Analytical Model For the I -V Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two extreme cases-α = 0 (all negative charges were carried by negative ions) and α = 1 (all negative charges were carried by electrons)-were examined to test the effect of different mobility. For both positive and negative ions, mobility was adopted at 2.9×10 -4 m 2 /s-V [27,30], while electron mobility was set at 0.4 m 2 /s-V [36]. The width parameter a of the ion generation profile g was set at 1 mm to approximate typical flame thickness.…”
Section: The Ionized Layer At the Center Of A Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the impact of electrons in this model is also small, because the applied voltages on the mesh electrodes are negative in this paper, so the direction of the electric field was from the ignition electrodes to the mesh electrodes (to the right in the simulation part of Figure 4). For this reason, only positive ions were driven to the premixed zone to produce the ionic wind effect, while electrons would be removed to the burned zone rapidly, due to their low number density and extremely high mobility (K = 4000 cm 2 /s/V) [36], which is at least three orders of magnitude higher than that of ions (K = 1.0 cm 2 /s/V) [28,37]. Although some research had shown that electrons may produce the excitation of nitrogen and other molecules by collisions [19,20], however, these chemical activation steps ocurred in the burned zones in this paper, so they would not have an obvious effect on the outward flame propagation.…”
Section: Numerical Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%