2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.621634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation and Interpretation of Substrate Assimilation Rates in Microbial Cells Based on Isotopic Composition Data Obtained by nanoSIMS

Abstract: Stable isotope probing (SIP) combined with nano-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS) is a powerful approach to quantify assimilation rates of elements such as C and N into individual microbial cells. Here, we use mathematical modeling to investigate how the derived rate estimates depend on the model used to describe substrate assimilation by a cell during a SIP incubation. We show that the most commonly used model, which is based on the simplifying assumptions of linearly increasing biomass of indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is difficult to envision how the rate of poly-P synthesis can vary within a single cell, as one expects the concentration of both substrates (e.g., P i ) and catalysts (poly-P kinases) to be homogeneous within the cytoplasm of a single cell. Therefore, a more important factor could be the timing of poly-P synthesis and breakdown in individual poly-P granules in combination with the poly-P content of granules at the beginning of the labeling period ( Polerecky et al, 2021 ). As discussed above, substantial poly-P turnover likely occurred during our incubations, potentially involving multiple cycles of synthesis and breakdown ( Supplementary Model ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is difficult to envision how the rate of poly-P synthesis can vary within a single cell, as one expects the concentration of both substrates (e.g., P i ) and catalysts (poly-P kinases) to be homogeneous within the cytoplasm of a single cell. Therefore, a more important factor could be the timing of poly-P synthesis and breakdown in individual poly-P granules in combination with the poly-P content of granules at the beginning of the labeling period ( Polerecky et al, 2021 ). As discussed above, substantial poly-P turnover likely occurred during our incubations, potentially involving multiple cycles of synthesis and breakdown ( Supplementary Model ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, even when the 18 O incorporation rate is similar and the labeling period is synchronized and identical among granules, one can expect variation, as differences in the 18 O labeling of poly-P granules can also arise due to a different granule size at the beginning of the labeling period. For example, if 18 O-labeled poly-P is incorporated into two differently sized granules and the rate of incorporation is the same for both granules, the smaller granule will have a greater 18 O atom fraction at the end of the incubation than the larger one ( Polerecky et al, 2021 ). This is because the incorporated 18 O is mixed across the whole granule, thus providing lower labeling levels for larger granules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that resting cells are maintaining cell integrity but not dividing, and did therefore not compensate for divisions as described in (Polerecky et al, 2021). Potential turnover time (years) of cellular C or N, T , was calculated using the following formula: T0.25em()years1goodbreak=1k()year1$$ T\ \left({\mathrm{year}\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\right)=\frac{1}{k\left({\mathrm{year}}^{-1}\right)} $$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that resting cells are maintaining cell integrity but not dividing, and did therefore not compensate for divisions as described in (Polerecky et al, 2021). Potential turnover time (years) of cellular C or N, T, was calculated using the following formula:…”
Section: Isotopic Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-cell MS has the advantages of direct and rapid detection without sample pretreatment and has a broad application prospect in the analysis of trace cell metabolites. 233 The commonly used ion sources are electrospray ionization (ESI), LAESI, secondary ion mass spectroscopy, 234 and MALDI. In the analysis process, there are usually the same challenges as ambient ionization MS, such as high matrix interference and difficulty in distinguishing isomers.…”
Section: And Characterization Of Small Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%