1968
DOI: 10.1021/ac60263a023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation methods for fluorescent x-ray spectrometry. Empirical coefficients versus fundamental parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
5

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
108
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mass absorption coefficient (m m ) is a function of m divided by the material density, being a more useful value. [28][29][30] Equation 1 shows how FP is applied for a very thin sample excitation by monochromatic radiation, calculated by software DXP-700E (version 1.0).…”
Section: Fundamental Parameter Analysis Of Ash Samples To Determine Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the mass absorption coefficient (m m ) is a function of m divided by the material density, being a more useful value. [28][29][30] Equation 1 shows how FP is applied for a very thin sample excitation by monochromatic radiation, calculated by software DXP-700E (version 1.0).…”
Section: Fundamental Parameter Analysis Of Ash Samples To Determine Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, FP presents a drawback related to the uncertainty in some values employed, such as mass absorption coefficients and fluorescence yields, aspects that can seriously impair the calculations, mainly if the sample under analysis is too complex. 30 Chemometrics or multivariate calibration is considered an important tool for analytical chemistry since it works only with non-correlated spectral variables having relevant information. The combination of XRF and multivariate calibration furnishes excellent solutions, as it can minimize or even eliminate analytical steps, mainly sample preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1967 Claisse and Quintin [7] (CQ): Generalization of the LT method for matrix effect corrections Introduce the weighting factor for each incident wavelength k Influence coefficients vary with concentrations 1968 Gilfrich and Birks [8]: the first measured incident spectrum Criss and Birks [9] The unification of all these XRF methods has led to a new fundamental method called the Fundamental Algorithm. As it stands, the Fundamental Algorithm contains all that is needed to calculate a sample composition from measured Xray intensities and also provides a complete and accurate correction for all matrix effects.…”
Section: (Lt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was first derived by Hamos (1945), and later discussed by Sherman (1954), Gillam & Heal (1952) and by Shiraiwa & Fujino (1966). However, it was not until Gilfrich & Birks (1968) determined the real spectral intensity distribution for W, Mo and Cr X-ray tubes that it was possible for Criss & Birks (1968) to calculate the exact fluorescence intensity for primary and secondary fluorescence due to polychromatic radiation. Recently, simplifications have been made in this type of analysis (Shen & Russ, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this method, the composition, which may be represented as a vector, is related to the fluorescent intensities, which may also be represented as a vector, by a matrix that contains the influence coefficients. The composition of a specimen is then found from its fluorescent intensities after evaluating the influence coefficient matrix from empirical relationships (Beattie & Brissey, 1954;Birks, 1959) or from multiple regression analysis performed on the fluorescence data for standards of similar composition on the specimen (Alley & Myers, 1965;Mitchell & O'Hear, 1966;Criss & Birks, 1968). The time required to prepare standards and the errors associated with the empirical coefficients, however, limits this approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%