1979
DOI: 10.1080/00268977900101261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of angular distributions in complex angular momentum theories of elastic scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pole DCS becomes smaller at large angles, where it possesses the characteristic oscillations of a backward glory. [143][144][145][146][147] If f pole (θ R ) is omitted from the CAM representation of Eq. (44), then it is found that all the oscillations in the full CAM DCS in Fig.…”
Section: H Results For the F + H 2 Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pole DCS becomes smaller at large angles, where it possesses the characteristic oscillations of a backward glory. [143][144][145][146][147] If f pole (θ R ) is omitted from the CAM representation of Eq. (44), then it is found that all the oscillations in the full CAM DCS in Fig.…”
Section: H Results For the F + H 2 Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next we examine Figure , which shows plots of the DCSs for the pole, direct, and refc subamplitudes together with the full uniform Watson/CAM DCSs for the three transitions. We note the following: The DCS for the pole subamplitude is small at large angles, where it possesses the characteristic oscillations of a backward glory (not visible in Figure c). At smaller angles, the oscillations damp out and the pole DCS becomes monotonic and comparable in magnitude to the full CAM DCS. The direct DCS is small at angles close to the forward direction but becomes comparable to the full CAM DCS at sideward and large angles. For the 300 and 310 cases in Figure a,b, the DCSs for the refc subamplitude are significant at small and sideward angles but then become very small at large angles. This is because the residue and erfc subamplitudes cancel in this angular range; the cancellation occurs when | u n (θ R )| ≫ 1 (see the appendix of ref ).…”
Section: Application To the F + H2 Reactionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Formulas (2.15) and (2.18) are used in the first-order as well as higher-order phase-integral calculations of l and r in the pole sum (2.11). As for the Legendre function, which is given in [27], where the accuracy is also discussed in detail.…”
Section: 'mentioning
confidence: 99%