2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.052510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Araki-Sucher correction for many-electron systems

Abstract: In this paper we consider the evaluation of the Araki-Sucher correction for arbitrary many-electron atomic and molecular systems. This contribution appears in the leading order quantum electrodynamics corrections to the energy of a bound state. The conventional one-electron basis set of Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs) is adopted; this leads to two-electron matrix elements which are evaluated with help of generalised the McMurchie-Davidson scheme. We also consider the convergence of the results towards the comple… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 ), as it excels for Yukawa ranges of several nanometers, complementing the range of ∼0.1 nm probed in the latter. In the future, with the development of next-generation optical molecular clocks 25,35 and with improved theoretical description of long range interactions 32,34 , our technique could constrain new gravitylike forces at unprecedented levels and provide a valuable means of testing new physics beyond the Standard Model 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 ), as it excels for Yukawa ranges of several nanometers, complementing the range of ∼0.1 nm probed in the latter. In the future, with the development of next-generation optical molecular clocks 25,35 and with improved theoretical description of long range interactions 32,34 , our technique could constrain new gravitylike forces at unprecedented levels and provide a valuable means of testing new physics beyond the Standard Model 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the current limits for nm to nm could be surpassed by about 1.5–2 orders of magnitude. This, however, will also require the inclusion of several subtle QED and relativistic effects 26,32,34 in the theoretical description of long range atomic interactions. If data for many isotopes are to be used 35,36 an ab initio calculation of isotope-dependent corrections, like the adiabatic, nonadiabatic or nuclear volume corrections 28 may prove necessary.…”
Section: Determination Of Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a, b are numerical constants, see Ref. [43]. Combining results from three consecutive basis sets, we find the following expression for the CBS limit in this case…”
Section: Ccsd(t) Ymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the latter case, the Hartree-Fock orbitals, the standard one-and twoelectron integrals, and integrals involving the relativistic operators were generated using the local version of the Dalton 2.0 package [37,39,42], while integrals involving the AS operator were computed using the computer code developed in Ref. [43].…”
Section: Ccsd(t) Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, separate treatment of singlet and triplet electron pairs can be invoked, and an analogous separation can be performed for core/valence electron pairs. It is also possible to generalize the zeta-function method to extrapolate relativistic and quantum electrodynamics corrections in light systems that are known to converge pathologically slowly [16,44] calculated at the FCI level of theory. All values are given in the atomic units and the abbreviations are the same as in Table II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%