1989
DOI: 10.1063/1.38005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of cosmogenic nuclides in stony meteorites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of mean production rates with relatively small variance can be explained by common meteorite samples being strongly biased with respect to meteoroid sizes and shielding depths. Our production rates for 53Mn in stony meteoroids are in disagreement with those calculated by Divadeenam et al (1990). They reported a depth profile with an increase from surface to center by a factor of nearly 4 for a radius of 50 em.…”
Section: Modelling the Production Of Mn In H-and L-chondritescontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of mean production rates with relatively small variance can be explained by common meteorite samples being strongly biased with respect to meteoroid sizes and shielding depths. Our production rates for 53Mn in stony meteoroids are in disagreement with those calculated by Divadeenam et al (1990). They reported a depth profile with an increase from surface to center by a factor of nearly 4 for a radius of 50 em.…”
Section: Modelling the Production Of Mn In H-and L-chondritescontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…They calculated depth-dependent spectra of primary and secondary GCR-particles in the lunar surface and derived depth-dependent production rates for some nuclides by directly evaluating the production of these nuclides from Monte Carlo calculations. Masarik et al (1986) also calculated directly the distribution of residual nuclides in meteoroids and in the lunar surface by Monte Carlo techniques and, recently, calculations of residual nuclide abundances in meteorites were presented by Divadeenam et al (1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%