24th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1986
DOI: 10.2514/6.1986-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Inviscid Transonic Flow over a Complete Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
139
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
139
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This set of faces will be defined as Γ B a (see Figure 2b). By using this approach, the discretisation of the fluxes using centred differences is equivalent to a classical Bubnov Galerkin spatial discretisation with linear elements [72][73][74]. This type of dual mesh also allows for the computation of the gradients by means of the Green-Gauss approach [75].…”
Section: Dual Mesh and Area Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set of faces will be defined as Γ B a (see Figure 2b). By using this approach, the discretisation of the fluxes using centred differences is equivalent to a classical Bubnov Galerkin spatial discretisation with linear elements [72][73][74]. This type of dual mesh also allows for the computation of the gradients by means of the Green-Gauss approach [75].…”
Section: Dual Mesh and Area Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revised formula, which preserves the accuracy of the numerical solution, is written in the following to (Jameson et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discrete Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [18] and [19] present a method based on such an approach. Since an arbitrary set of points admits a triangulation, the problem can be simplified by separating the procedure for generating mesh points from the procedure for triangulating them.…”
Section: Airplane Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as new points are added, it is necessary to test for this eventuality, and whenever it occurs the reconnection is modified to preserve the integrity of the solid boundary. This approach to mesh generation has been combined with the finite element method outlined in Section 2 to perform flow calculations for complete aircraft [18,19]. Calculations with this number of mesh points require just under 12 million words of memory.…”
Section: Airplane Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation