2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4799868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of listener-specific head-related transfer functions: Effect of mesh quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such case, a 3-D model of the subject's head need to be constructed using scanning techniques. Naturally, the quality of the mesh has been identified as an important factor in determining the quality of the simulated HRTFs [147].…”
Section: Binaural Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such case, a 3-D model of the subject's head need to be constructed using scanning techniques. Naturally, the quality of the mesh has been identified as an important factor in determining the quality of the simulated HRTFs [147].…”
Section: Binaural Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the laser scanner was not able to scan hairy surfaces. Thus, the subjects wore a custom tailored cap with holes for the ears (Ziegelwanger et al , 2013). In a post-processing procedure, a 3D triangular polygon mesh was extracted from a volumetric representation with approximately 0.5 mm voxel size.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a scanner is not limited in the amount of radiation by medical concerns and is capable to deliver a detailed representation of the pinna geometry. To prevent the subjects from the harmful x-ray radiation, silicone impressions of subjects’ pinnae and surrounding area were made (viscosity: 2200 MPa·s, shore hardness: A 22, for more details on the silicon impressions see Ziegelwanger et al , 2013). The impressions were then scanned using 1000 x-ray images spaced in 0.36° intervals (tube settings: 120 kV, 260 μ A, average of three images with 333-ms exposure time each).…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations