2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1510118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of nuclear magnetic shieldings. XV. Ab initio zeroth-order regular approximation method

Abstract: An ab initio zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA) theory for relativistic calculation of the nuclear magnetic shielding tensors is presented at the Hartree–Fock level. The nuclear magnetic shieldings tensors of hydrogen halides, HX (X=F, Cl, Br, and I), are calculated, and the results are compared to experimental values and other calculated results obtained using the Douglas–Kroll–Hess (DKH) transformation, the four-component random phase approximation (RPA), and the Dirac–Fock (DF) approaches. It is show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested 6 that it would be interesting to compare the individual terms in Kutzelnigg's approach to the outcome of the perturbative quadratic response by Manninen et al 8 and Melo et al 9,10 Approximate two-component methods to calculate nuclear-magnetic shieldings also yield different decompositions into para-and diamagnetic components of magnetic properties. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Among them, in the linear response within the elimination of small component ͑LR-ESC͒ approach, 9 the separation into para-and diamagnetic terms is explicitly obtained by considering separately the contributions from electronic excited states on one hand, and contributions from electron-positron pair-creation terms on the other. This decomposition is therefore fully consistent with the one carried out in the four-component linear-response calculations 1,2 which considers separately the contributions from electronic and positronic states to a given positive-energy fourcomponent spinor in order to define the paramagnetic and diamagnetic components.…”
Section: Formal Relations Connecting Different Approaches To Calculatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested 6 that it would be interesting to compare the individual terms in Kutzelnigg's approach to the outcome of the perturbative quadratic response by Manninen et al 8 and Melo et al 9,10 Approximate two-component methods to calculate nuclear-magnetic shieldings also yield different decompositions into para-and diamagnetic components of magnetic properties. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Among them, in the linear response within the elimination of small component ͑LR-ESC͒ approach, 9 the separation into para-and diamagnetic terms is explicitly obtained by considering separately the contributions from electronic excited states on one hand, and contributions from electron-positron pair-creation terms on the other. This decomposition is therefore fully consistent with the one carried out in the four-component linear-response calculations 1,2 which considers separately the contributions from electronic and positronic states to a given positive-energy fourcomponent spinor in order to define the paramagnetic and diamagnetic components.…”
Section: Formal Relations Connecting Different Approaches To Calculatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this BS double finite perturbation (BS/FPT-2) approach are shown in the fifth column of table 1. The basis set sizes used here [23] are (10s6p) for H, (15s10p3d) for F, (17s14p6d) for Cl, (21s17p8d4f) for Br and (25s21p12d8f) for I. The magnitudes of finite perturbations in atomic units were as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present authors have already presented relativistic calculations of nuclear magnetic shieldings in hydrogen halides based on the DKH method [20][21][22][23] and zerothorder regular approximation (ZORA) [23]. However, the results of these two approaches differ considerably, rendering it still necessary to establish an accurate and reliable scheme for evaluating nuclear magnetic shielding tensors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is the case of the zeroth order regular approximation 8,9 ͑ZORA͒ and related approaches, the Douglas-Kroll-Hess formalism [10][11][12] or Breit Pauli [13][14][15][16][17] twocomponent formalism. In most cases, these approaches are based on one-body operators only or make explicit use of the no-pair approximation to the Hamiltonian which contains the magnetic field interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%