Calculation of scan length and size‐specific dose at longitudinal positions of body CT scans using dose equilibrium function

Abstract

Background: Dose evaluation at longitudinal positions of body computed tomography (CT) scans is useful for CT quality assurance programs and patient organ dose evaluation. Accurate estimates depend on both patient size and scan length. Purpose: To propose practical evaluation of the average dose to the transverse slab of an axial image slice for adult body CT examinations, considering not only patient size but also scan length, and to compare the results with those of Monte Carlo (Geant4) simulation [D sim (z)] and size-specific dose estimates at longitudinal positions of scans [SSDE(z)] from international standards (IEC publication no. 62985). Methods: In a scan series, the total dose at each z-axis location was calculated using the input information identical to the SSDE(z) evaluation.Each axial image slice (slice thickness, 2.5 or 5 mm) was first considered independently. Its z-axis coverage and CTDI vol (from the DICOM headers) were used to directly calculate a z-axis dose profile for the average dose over the cross-section of a water phantom, using the approach to equilibrium function. The phantom diameter was taken to be equal to the patient water equivalent diameter at that slice. The above was repeated at all slices and the dose at each z-axis location was accumulated from all profiles, referred to as D calc (z). For validation, we considered a cohort of 65 patients, who underwent chest and abdominopelvic examinations. The resultant D calc (z) was compared with D sim (z) and SSDE(z), both available in a previous paper. Results: D calc (z) evaluation could be used to accurately assess the scan range average dose, with an accuracy of 7.1%-8.7% for 65 patients in two examinations. On individual image slices, the maximum difference in magnitude between D calc (z) and D sim (z) [and between SSDE(z) and D sim (z) in parentheses] was 37.5% (85%) [two edges (2 × 5 cm) of chest scan range], 17.8% (35.2%) (the remaining central region of chest scan), 26.8% (74.1%) [two edges (2 × 5 cm) of abdominopelvic scan range], and 14.2% (22.5%) (the remaining central region of abdominopelvic scan). Conclusions: Identical input data are used for D calc (z) and SSDE(z) evaluations. The latter is limited to the z-axis locations within scan range. At each image slice, SSDE(z) is equivalent to the midpoint dose of a fixed-mA scan of 15-30 cm (scan length). In contrast, D calc (z) considers dose accumulation from Abbreviations: CTDI vol , volumetric CT dose index; D calc (z), direct calculation of average dose to transverse slab of the patient undergoing body CT; D calc (z), scan range average of D calc (z); D sim (z), Monte Carlo simulation of average dose to transverse slab of the patient undergoing body CT; D sim (z), scan range average of D sim (z); D slice , average dose to the 2.5 or 5 mm thick transverse slab of an axial image slice; D slice , scan range average of D slice ; D W , water equivalent diameter; SSDE(z), size-specific dose estimate, at longitudinal position z; SSDE(z), scan range average of SSDE(z).

An evaluation of automated measurement of slice sensitivity profile of computed tomography image: field of view variations

“…This algorithm was only applied in DICOM format, since the DICOM consists of two important data sets, i.e. image data set and a header which provides information on the image needed for the analysis such as the matrix size and pixel size, which was very helpful on the analysis process [23]. Implementation of this algorithm in other than DICOM format should be accompanied by pixel size information.…”

Estudo experimental dos perfis de dose em tomografia computadorizada

“…• Utilizar a função 𝐻(𝐿) para calcular o SSDE(z), conforme indicado no trabalho de Li et al (LI;MARSCHALL;LIU, 2022).…”