2011
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/44/18/184003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of state selective field ionization of hydrogen atoms in a strong magnetic field

Abstract: We have performed classical and quantum calculations for a hydrogen atom in a strong magnetic field exposed to a parallel electric field that linearly increases with time. The calculations were performed for the situation where the electron is launched from near the nucleus and for a microcanonical ensemble. For the case of low angular momentum, the classical and quantum calculations are compared. We show that there exist stable classical trajectories at positive energy and that these contribute to the possibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the survival probability at E = 0 gives the probability for the Ps to be emitted in four different angular ranges. Secondly, the main drop in the survival probability is spread over a larger range of E-fields than would be expected from the paper [11]; this is because the Ps that are formed have a variation in their binding energy and Ps with larger/weaker binding energy can survive stronger/weaker fields. Thirdly, the Ps that are in the range 3/4 |cos(θ)| 1 (the Ps traveling most nearly in the z-direction) are destroyed by weaker electric fields on average; this is because the more weakly bound atoms are correlated with traveling in the z-direction.…”
Section: Multiple E + Collisions E-fieldmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, the survival probability at E = 0 gives the probability for the Ps to be emitted in four different angular ranges. Secondly, the main drop in the survival probability is spread over a larger range of E-fields than would be expected from the paper [11]; this is because the Ps that are formed have a variation in their binding energy and Ps with larger/weaker binding energy can survive stronger/weaker fields. Thirdly, the Ps that are in the range 3/4 |cos(θ)| 1 (the Ps traveling most nearly in the z-direction) are destroyed by weaker electric fields on average; this is because the more weakly bound atoms are correlated with traveling in the z-direction.…”
Section: Multiple E + Collisions E-fieldmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Donnan et al [11] computed the ionization of an atom in a strong magnetic field by a rising electric field. Their figure 2 shows the result for n = 30 and a 1 T magnetic field.…”
Section: Multiple E + Collisions E-fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A worry is that the electric field should smoothly turn on to avoid artefacts from discontinuities in the time derivative of the Hamiltonian. To avoid this we chose the time dependent electric field to have a similar form from [31]:…”
Section: Ramped Electric Field Results: Full Classicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper by Donnan et al [27], the stability of deeply bound Rydberg hydrogen states in parallel constant magnetic and time-increasing electric fields is investigated. These calculations are useful for understanding the dynamics of atom formation in antihydrogen traps.…”
Section: Rydberg Atoms In External Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%