1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(86)90115-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of supercooling temperature for primary nucleation of potassium nitrate from aqueous solution by the two-kind active site model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental data in the literature are always not the case even when careful attention [3,11] is paid to exclude hetero-nuclei that induce heterogeneous nucleation. Another evidence showing the difficulty in realizing homogeneous nucleation is the filtering effect on nucleation; the value of DT 10 increases (i.e., nucleation becomes more unlikely to occur) by filtering the solution [4,11]. Homogeneous nucleation is never affected by filtration.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Nucleation or Homogeneous Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, experimental data in the literature are always not the case even when careful attention [3,11] is paid to exclude hetero-nuclei that induce heterogeneous nucleation. Another evidence showing the difficulty in realizing homogeneous nucleation is the filtering effect on nucleation; the value of DT 10 increases (i.e., nucleation becomes more unlikely to occur) by filtering the solution [4,11]. Homogeneous nucleation is never affected by filtration.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Nucleation or Homogeneous Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The data for m-aminobenzoic acid and L-histidine solutions reported by Jiang et al [10] may be the case. However, if the number of heteronuclei is reduced by filtration, each small sample cannot include equal number of hetero-nuclei any more [11]. The probability of nucleation per sample per unit time B 1 M is not the same for all the samples and the plot of ln P r vs. t is curved [3,11].…”
Section: Heterogeneous Nucleation or Homogeneous Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the lowest secondary nucleation rate with a kinetic constant of k b2 = 1 6 10 4 s 21 kg solvent 21 uC 2b2 , the simulated induction time is nearly the same as that calculated by eqn (14) (dotted line). Eqn (14) is obtained from eqn (12) for a constant temperature T with the assumption of no secondary nucleation and no concentration change (i.e., T sat is equal to the initial saturation temperature T 0 ). Setting (N/M) primary = (N/M) det and rearranging leads to the following equation (see also Kubota 18 ).…”
Section: The Effects Of the Kinetic Constant K B2 On Induction Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] It is usually defined as the time elapsed from supersaturation creation to ''new phase detection'' under isothermal conditions. The term ''new phase detection'' has been interpreted in different ways 3 depending on the researcher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting c dt as the probability for a non-ordered system before the last adsorption to get ordered within time interval between t and t + dt, the integration with respect to time gives the probability P (t) for the system not to get ordered from t = 0 to t = t to be as given by Kubota and Kawakami (1986) for nucleation phenomenon:…”
Section: Rate Process For the Order Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%