1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00339-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the complete Glauber amplitude for p+6He scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OLA cross section is slightly smaller than that of the full calculation, which, differently from a nucleus-nucleus case, holds true for a proton-nucleus system [4,15]. Figures 5.a and 5.b compare the elastic differential cross sections of p+ 6 He and p+ 6 Li at T p =0.7 GeV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The OLA cross section is slightly smaller than that of the full calculation, which, differently from a nucleus-nucleus case, holds true for a proton-nucleus system [4,15]. Figures 5.a and 5.b compare the elastic differential cross sections of p+ 6 He and p+ 6 Li at T p =0.7 GeV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GeV. An α+n+n cluster-model result[15] is shown for p+ 6 He atT p =0.717 GeV. The statistical error of the Monte Carlo integration is shown for the GFMC and VMC results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) is difficult because the expression involves 3(A P + A T )-dimensional integration. For the 1 H target, it is possible to reduce the dimension of the integral in the Glauber amplitude when the projectile wave function is represented by some specific forms such as a Gaussian form [30] or a Slater determinant of single-particle wave functions [28,[31][32][33]. For nucleus-nucleus scattering, the explicit evaluation is in general tedious, and thus one has to introduce some approximations to reduce the complexity.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Multidimensional Integration In the Glaubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at E = 41 MeV, Ref. 39), for qualitative assessment of the cross section). In our case, we also see that the calculated DCS is in good agreement with the experiment at not large angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%