2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the enthalpies of formation for transition metal complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it needs to be mentioned that the choice of the LANL2DZ basis set is dictated by the limited availability of high-quality atomic orbital basis sets for the zinc atom. The LANL2DZ basis set outperforms the popular relativistic effective core potentials of Stevens et al [77] and the relativistic effective core potentials of Dolg and coworkers [78,79] to calculate the structural characteristics [80][81][82] and gas-phase formation enthalpies [83] of transition metal complexes at both MP2 and DFT levels. Moreover, it has been found that all-electron basis sets for heavy metals such as LANL2DZ give the rise to a large BSSE [84].…”
Section: Bsse Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it needs to be mentioned that the choice of the LANL2DZ basis set is dictated by the limited availability of high-quality atomic orbital basis sets for the zinc atom. The LANL2DZ basis set outperforms the popular relativistic effective core potentials of Stevens et al [77] and the relativistic effective core potentials of Dolg and coworkers [78,79] to calculate the structural characteristics [80][81][82] and gas-phase formation enthalpies [83] of transition metal complexes at both MP2 and DFT levels. Moreover, it has been found that all-electron basis sets for heavy metals such as LANL2DZ give the rise to a large BSSE [84].…”
Section: Bsse Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of ccCA-tm performing unsatisfactorily is in the modeling of larger TM carbonyls; for example, for Ni(CO) 4 , Fe(CO) 5 , and Cr(CO) 6 , ccCA-tm shows errors of 30-100 kcal mol -1 . While consolation may be taken in the fact that the ccCA-tm deviations for carbonyl systems are still much smaller than those obtained using standard DFT/ECP approaches, 45 further work is necessary to determine whether the disagreement is caused by deterioration of ccCA-tm with respect to increasing molecular size or by something inherent in carbonyl or related π-acid ligands. Our initial observations suggest an intriguing origin for these discrepancies, as a more sophisticated treatment of the corevalence electron correlation substantially improves the calculated ∆H f°f or carbonyl complexes.…”
Section: ∆E(cv) ) E[ccsd(t)](fc1) -E[ccsd(t)] (110)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the average experimental σ of (2-3 kcal mol -1 as an initial estimate of "TM chemical accuracy," we find that ccCA-tm thus performs adequately for this test set and is quite superior to DFT-based methods. 38, 45 Cognizance must be taken of the potential for issues in the modeling of 3d TM complexes that arise from the underlying perturbation theory assumptions of many of the ccCA-tm computations. Such computations may not provide an accurate description of both static and dynamic electron correlation, and problems can arise from the inherently multireference nature of many TM species.…”
Section: ∆E(cv) ) E[ccsd(t)](fc1) -E[ccsd(t)] (110)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It provides an effective way to reduce computational expense. On the other hand, the LANL2DZ basis set outperforms the popular relativistic effective core potentials of Stevens et al (1992) and the relativistic effective core potentials of Dolg (2000), in calculations involving the structural characteristics (Day et al, 2000;Widjaja and Musgravea, 2002) and gas-phase formation enthalpies (Cundari et al, 2005) of transition metal complexes at the DFT level.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 98%