Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Klempner and Vasil'ev [i] have investigated the sensitivities of methods of measuring the ash content of coal with the aid of ionizing radiation.In [2] they analyzed the methodological error and derived an expression for it when there is a single flux of radiation and no correlation between the parameters of the object of control. However, owing to Increased requirements for precision of measurement, multiple measurementsare now being widely used [3]. In this connection we may generalize and supplement the results in [i, 2] to the case of several fluxes of radiation.The density of each of n fluxes of ionizing radiation, %e, is expressed as a function %e(X~p, Xnp) of two vectors, the ash-forming parameter X ~ and the non-ash-formlng parameter ap X 1 np Xap = {Xal, Xa~, ..., Xam}, Xnp= {~al, ~a2, ..., =n~},where Xaj is an ash-forming parameter, the concentration of the J-th component of the ash in the mass of coal (the first component x ~ is the principal one, the others are impurities), and Xnl is a non-ash-forming parameter ~the moisture content of the coal, the geometrical parameters, etc.). Consequentlys the sensitivity of the l-th flux to the ash content coincides with the sensitivity to the principal component~ ')et (-Yap, Xnp) ,)e, (Xalp, Xnp') (4)Since we are investigating the dependencesof the density ~ of the flux of radiation on two types of argument (I) and (2) and are considering two functionsp we can refer to two types of sensitivity of the flux to the ash-forming parameters (e.g., to the iron concentration Xaa = Cye):
Klempner and Vasil'ev [i] have investigated the sensitivities of methods of measuring the ash content of coal with the aid of ionizing radiation.In [2] they analyzed the methodological error and derived an expression for it when there is a single flux of radiation and no correlation between the parameters of the object of control. However, owing to Increased requirements for precision of measurement, multiple measurementsare now being widely used [3]. In this connection we may generalize and supplement the results in [i, 2] to the case of several fluxes of radiation.The density of each of n fluxes of ionizing radiation, %e, is expressed as a function %e(X~p, Xnp) of two vectors, the ash-forming parameter X ~ and the non-ash-formlng parameter ap X 1 np Xap = {Xal, Xa~, ..., Xam}, Xnp= {~al, ~a2, ..., =n~},where Xaj is an ash-forming parameter, the concentration of the J-th component of the ash in the mass of coal (the first component x ~ is the principal one, the others are impurities), and Xnl is a non-ash-forming parameter ~the moisture content of the coal, the geometrical parameters, etc.). Consequentlys the sensitivity of the l-th flux to the ash content coincides with the sensitivity to the principal component~ ')et (-Yap, Xnp) ,)e, (Xalp, Xnp') (4)Since we are investigating the dependencesof the density ~ of the flux of radiation on two types of argument (I) and (2) and are considering two functionsp we can refer to two types of sensitivity of the flux to the ash-forming parameters (e.g., to the iron concentration Xaa = Cye):
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.