2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the level density parameter using semi-classical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 includes these model definitions with their f rms and f lev values, which are calculated for 1136 nuclei using Eqs. (17) and (18), respectively, and also shows the results of our preceding studies [12,13]. The unique difference between Model 2 and the singleparticle potential used in Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 includes these model definitions with their f rms and f lev values, which are calculated for 1136 nuclei using Eqs. (17) and (18), respectively, and also shows the results of our preceding studies [12,13]. The unique difference between Model 2 and the singleparticle potential used in Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This redescription takes into account corrections for both the shell and pairing effects in addition to the value obtained from the semi-classical approximation analytically or numerically. Using the semi-classical approximation [13] requires a well-defined single-particle potential because it directly determines ã, which is the limit value of the level density parameter for the energies above the neutron separation energy. Therefore, the single-particle potential almost remains the only component to improve the success of the reaction calculations that uses the level density as an ingredient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that the pairing of the valence nucleons has a strong influence on the collective excitations. [26] Effective 1.12 43.9 BSFGM [20] Effective 1.68 28.5 BSFGM [20] Collective 1.71 35.3 CGCM [20] Effective 1.76 24.2 CGCM [20] Collective 1.77 47.8 GSM [20] Effective 1.78 28.0 GSM [20] Collective 1.94 47. The goodness-of-fit estimators, f rms and f lev , values obtained from the both local and global calculations are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytic calculation of the asymptotic level density parameter including the shell and pairing effects leads the semi-classical approach previously described in Ref. [26] to more physical point. In addition, the slight difference between the results of the global and local fit increases the reliability of the extrapolation of the global parameters to mass region from the stability valley to drip lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To use this method the deformation lengths of the projectile and target should be determined from a structure model. Nuclear level density (NLD) could have been one of the candidates but it always has been a problem to describe the low-lying collective states for NLD models [4,5]. To overcome this problem, recently, we have proposed a Laplace-like formula for the energy dependence of the nuclear level density parameter, which is the main parameter of NLD, including collective effects [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%