2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the stability and solubility of methane hydrate in seawater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
208
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
208
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this simulation was to assess rates of fluid advection and bioirrigation. The site was chosen for simulation runs because gas hydrates were found within 40-100 cm sediment depth in several gravity cores within a radius of less than 1 km around Flare 2 and thus the lower boundary concentration of methane in equilibrium with gas hydrates (85 mM) could be estimated following Tishchenko et al (2005). This approach is consistent, for example, with estimates of in situ methane concentrations used for pore water modeling at gas hydrate-bearing cold seeps on Hydrate Ridge off Oregon, USA and at the Hikurangi Margin off New Zealand (Dale et al, 2010).…”
Section: Geochemical Modeling With "Cotrem"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this simulation was to assess rates of fluid advection and bioirrigation. The site was chosen for simulation runs because gas hydrates were found within 40-100 cm sediment depth in several gravity cores within a radius of less than 1 km around Flare 2 and thus the lower boundary concentration of methane in equilibrium with gas hydrates (85 mM) could be estimated following Tishchenko et al (2005). This approach is consistent, for example, with estimates of in situ methane concentrations used for pore water modeling at gas hydrate-bearing cold seeps on Hydrate Ridge off Oregon, USA and at the Hikurangi Margin off New Zealand (Dale et al, 2010).…”
Section: Geochemical Modeling With "Cotrem"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the pump rate, methane concentration, and surface area of the sediment, a methane flux of 0.28 and 2.81 mmol m −2 d −1 was calculated for the LFC and HFC, respectively. These methane concentrations were lower than those potentially encountered under in situ conditions because the cores were not pressurized, resulting in lower methane fluxes (after Tishchenko et al, 2005;Karaca et al, 2012). After 260 d the first experimental phase ended and the pump rates were increased from low to high flow velocities for the LFC, and vice versa for the HFC.…”
Section: Sediment-flow-through Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbonate precipitation was implemented in the model (Krause et al, 2014) but was not used in the present study, since carbonate precipitation does not affect the efficiency of the microbial benthic methane filter within the studied timescales (several months to years). Because the sampling sites were located above the GHSZ , dissolved methane concentrations at the lower boundary were calculated from the equilibrium concentration with free gas (Tishchenko et al, 2005). Table 2 provides an overview of other boundary conditions as well as fitted, measured, and calculated parameters of the model.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methane concentrations determined during this study are well below saturation (1.2 mmol L -1 at 1 bar, 35 psu, 20°C; calc. after Tishchenko et al 2005) hence loss of methane due to pressure release during recovery of the lander can be excluded.…”
Section: Sommer Et Al Oxygen Controlled Benthic Flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%