1997
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4549(96)00059-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the systematic error and correction factors in gamma waste assay system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different 'hot spots' distances from the center of the drum are the main reason for wide reading variations when the drum is rotated. The different positions of the 'hot spots' are the main cause of activity estimation errors [1]. The first standard correction procedure handles gamma attenuation using density estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different 'hot spots' distances from the center of the drum are the main reason for wide reading variations when the drum is rotated. The different positions of the 'hot spots' are the main cause of activity estimation errors [1]. The first standard correction procedure handles gamma attenuation using density estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the systematic error of SGS is large because of the unknown spatial distribution of the radioactive sources and matrix heterogeneity. Especially, non-uniform distribution of radiation sources frequently causes the largest error; moreover, the inhomogeneity of matrix also enlarges the measurement error (Dung, 1997(Dung, , 1998. There are also some improved SGS techniques (Anh et al, 2005;Bai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%