2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of threshold displacement energies in UO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mostly due to the difference in atomic weights. The same conclusion was deduced in the studies of other binary alloys [47][48][49] .…”
Section: Repulsive Potential and Threshold Displacement Energiessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is mostly due to the difference in atomic weights. The same conclusion was deduced in the studies of other binary alloys [47][48][49] .…”
Section: Repulsive Potential and Threshold Displacement Energiessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As a result, the main contribution characterizing the displacement of atoms may come from the differences between their binding energies making the use of static calculations relevant. Indeed, such approach has been successfully employed to characterize irradiation effects on carbon nanotubes [29], BN sheets [19] and also bulk materials like UO 2 [32]. In case of hBN (pristine and nanopores), our results of displacement energies from static calculations are given in Table S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sattonnay and Li potentials moved beyond a rigid-ion model to include charge transfer between atoms. A number of detailed studies ,,− have compared the properties of contemporary potentials to expertimental or DFT data, such as thermal expansion, mechanical properties, and defect energies. The ability of a potential to capture such properties is the primary metric used to evaluate the quality of the potential.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Under Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%