2016
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2016.1191688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations of the EPR g-tensor using unrestricted two- and four-component relativistic approaches within the HF and DFT frameworks

Abstract: Approaches and programs for calculations of the EPR g-tensor in the framework of the two-and fourcomponent methods are still very rare. There are three main reasons for this: the wider community's unawareness of the importance of second-and higher order spin-orbit effects on the g-tensor, the methodological problems associated with performing such calculations and the lack of understanding of these problems. This paper reports on the implementation of a method for calculation of the g-tensor in the framework o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superscript J v indicates that the molecular orbitals depend on the chosen direction of magnetization, v , as described in refs. and . In ref.…”
Section: A Short Review Of the Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superscript J v indicates that the molecular orbitals depend on the chosen direction of magnetization, v , as described in refs. and . In ref.…”
Section: A Short Review Of the Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The superscript J v indicates that the molecular orbitals depend on the chosen directiono fm agnetization, v,a sd escribed in refs. [21] and [22].I nr ef. [6],t he use of ar estricted kinetically balanced basis set is described, which leads to the following final expression [Eq.…”
Section: -Component Dirac-kohn-sham Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the case of compounds containing 3d transition metal complexes it is sufficient to treat the relativistic SOC effects in the evaluation of the g-tensor as a perturbation of the non-relativistic wavefunction, 44 in the case of 4d- and 5d- transition metal compounds the explicit inclusion of both scalar and SOC relativistic effects 82 appears neccessary. 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 Herein, we wish to compare the performance of the g-tensor evaluation of 2 [1] − using a perturbative inclusion of SOC in the scalar relativistic ZORA wavefunction using either DFT or CASSCF levels of theory 44 with the rigorous treatment of relativistic effects and g-tensor evaluation at the DKS level. 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 Furthermore, the solvent polarization effects will be considered for further consistency via the COSMO approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52, 53, 54 The non-collinear Kramers unrestricted formalism was used as the best currently available method for description of spin polarization at the relativistic DFT level of theory. 51, 54, 55 The recent implementation of solvent models in the ReSpect program 51 allowed us to take into account effects of the environment (Me 2 SO) in the framework of COSMO model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed discussion of four-component g-tensor calculations and the di↵erences between Kramers restricted and unrestricted methods can be found in Refs. [35,97].…”
Section: Four-component Epr Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%