2005
DOI: 10.1134/1.2132400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations of the percolation thresholds of a three-dimensional (icosahedral) Penrose tiling by the cubic approximant method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small graphs are expected to have relatively broad percolation transitions, as shown for both a capsid and random 120-subunit graphs in Figure 4. An examination of percolation in larger icosahedra saw a similar effect [45]. For very large graphs, one expects a more abrupt phase transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Small graphs are expected to have relatively broad percolation transitions, as shown for both a capsid and random 120-subunit graphs in Figure 4. An examination of percolation in larger icosahedra saw a similar effect [45]. For very large graphs, one expects a more abrupt phase transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Note that the icosahedral Penrose lattice has a range of coordination numbers with an average also of 6, and has site threshold of 0.285 and a bond threshold of 0.225 [21]; these thresholds were found by an approximate method and the expected errors are note clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Table I we compare the thresholds found here with other 3D systems with a coordination number of 6, both regular lattices (the kagome stack and simple cubic) and more disordered ones (the dice stack and the icosahedral Penrose lattice [21]). Having a distribution of coordination number z is seen to lower the threshold, but this does not apply to the case of site percolation on the packed spheres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, eq. ( 25) (solid line) captures the main trend as a function of 1/Z of the calculated p c values for several periodic lattices with coordination radius including first and beyond first-nearest neighbours [9][10][11][12][13], and for periodic and aperiodic systems with distributed values of the coordination number Z i [14][15][16]. The present two-site EMA gives thus reasonable estimates of p c for both periodic and topologically disordered lattices already at the two-site approximation level, which explains the 25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%