1968
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/2/1/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations on the arrival-time distribution and energy content of extensive air showers at large core distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 g cm-2 lower in the atmosphere and having sizes a t sea level some 50 % smaller than cascades derived under approximation B. A similar conclusion is reached by Marsden (1971), who compares cascades derived under approximation B with others derived from approximation A with the numerical data of Baxter (1969).…”
Section: Gen E R a L Sh O W Er Da Ta (A)supporting
confidence: 68%
“…50 g cm-2 lower in the atmosphere and having sizes a t sea level some 50 % smaller than cascades derived under approximation B. A similar conclusion is reached by Marsden (1971), who compares cascades derived under approximation B with others derived from approximation A with the numerical data of Baxter (1969).…”
Section: Gen E R a L Sh O W Er Da Ta (A)supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Regarding the risetime of the signals, Linsley and Scarsi [32] demonstrated that the thickness of the disc of particles in the shower increased from a few meters near the axis to several hundreds of meters at large distances. Using Haverah Park data, a study showed that the spread of the arrival time distribution was decreased by attenuation across the array [33].…”
Section: Concept Of Azimuthal Asymmetry In the Risetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. Vasquez, 36 J.R. Vázquez, 17 R.A. Vázquez, 13 D. Veberič, 33 V. Verzi, 47 J. Vicha, 30 M. Videla, 10 L. Villaseñor, 49 S. Vorobiov, 73 H. Wahlberg, 70 O. Wainberg, 10,11 D. Walz, 40 A.A. Watson, 99 M. Weber, 76 A. Weindl, 33 L. Wiencke, 81 H. Wilczyński, 37 T. Winchen, 25 D. Wittkowski, 25 B. Wundheiler, 10 S. Wykes, 42 L. Yang, 73 T. Yapici, 51 D. Yelos, 11,10 A. Yushkov, 1 E. Zas, 13 D. Zavrtanik, 73, 72 M. Zavrtanik, 72, 73 A. Zepeda, 85 B. Zimmermann, 76 M. Ziolkowski, 1 Z. Zong, 64 and F. Zuccarello 43,44 (The Pierre Auger Collaboration) *…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 500 m from the axis of an event produced by a primary particle of ∼ 10 18 eV about half of the energy flow is carried by electrons and photons that are very largely absorbed in the water with the remaining energy being carried by muons. It was found the E 100 was ∼ 1/160th of the primary energy [Baxter, 1969]. This method of estimating the primary energy was used to argue that a shower of energy > 5 · 10 19 eV had been detected at Haverah Park soon after the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin prediction (1966) that such events should be rare [Andrews, 1968].…”
Section: Haverah Parkmentioning
confidence: 99%