2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijbaf.2015.072405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calendar anomalies: a survey of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No month of the day effect is demonstrated, thus showing that stock returns in January (the month of the New Year and Chinese Lunar New Year in 2014) are statistically the same as other months. The results are in line with many studies as summarized in Patel and Sewell (2015); but is contrary to Teng and Yang (2018) who suggest a significant Chinese Lunar New Year effect which can mainly attributed to public positive emotions. The coefficients of dummy variables maintain unchanged when different IMSs are added in the model, thus strengthening the robustness of our empirical results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…No month of the day effect is demonstrated, thus showing that stock returns in January (the month of the New Year and Chinese Lunar New Year in 2014) are statistically the same as other months. The results are in line with many studies as summarized in Patel and Sewell (2015); but is contrary to Teng and Yang (2018) who suggest a significant Chinese Lunar New Year effect which can mainly attributed to public positive emotions. The coefficients of dummy variables maintain unchanged when different IMSs are added in the model, thus strengthening the robustness of our empirical results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The month of the year effect indicates that from January to December the average asset returns are not similar. Many empirical studies (e.g., Rozeff & Kinney, 1976;Haug & Hirschey, 2006;Balint & Gica, 2012;Patel & Sewell, 2015) have concluded that January returns are significantly larger than returns of the other months. The day of the week effect signifies that for Monday through Friday, the mean asset returns are not similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ziegler and Ziemba (2015) have also studied the effect of weather on the sell-in-May research in many countries, and find that when the weather is good, the returns are higher on average. Additional references related to this sellin-May phenomenon are Agrrawal and Skaves (2015), Bee et al (2016), Dzhabarov and Ziemba (2010), Fiore and Saha (2015), Jacobsen and Visaltanachoti (2009), Keloharju and Linnainmaa (2015), Patel and Sewell (2015), Swinkels and van Vliet (2012), Witte (2010), and Zhang and Jacobsen (2012).…”
Section: Constantine Dzhabarov and Bill Ziembamentioning
confidence: 99%