Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
According to medieval common law, assault against a pregnant woman causing miscarriage after the fi rst trimester was homicide. Some scholars have argued, however, that in practice English jurors refused to acknowledge assaults of this nature as homicide. The underlying argument is that because abortion by assault is a crime against women, male jurors were loath to impose the death penalty. A reexamination of the material notes that while conviction rates for assault on pregnant women were low, the English believed such assaults were felonies. Moreover, the role played by husbands as plaintiffs makes it clear that this was not merely a women's issue. Abortion by assault was never an easy judgment for jurors to deliver. In particular, the medical expertise required to pass judgment on such a case presented jurors with diffi culties that may have prevented conviction of abortion by assault in many cases. T he recent signing of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act by President George W. Bush, passed by the Senate in March 2004 and signed into law on 1 April of the same year, in many ways is a dramatic departure from current western positions on the legal rights of a fetus. Since the famed American case of Roe v. Wade, law courts throughout the western world have generally refused to acknowledge a fetus as a separate legal entity capable of being victimized. The passage of this bill and its ratifi cation by Bush both endows fetuses with legal life and champions their human rights. Thus, under federal law the death of a fetus, at any stage of development, resulting from a violent attack, is now recognized as homicide. It should be acknowledged, however, that this is not the fi rst time western law has claimed rights for the unborn. As early as the Middle Ages, English common law courts adopted a harsh stance on the issue of abortion by assault, although it is important to note that medieval Englishmen defi ned abortion somewhat differently than we do today. Medieval legal treatises emphasized two pivotal moments. First, the quickening, meaning the earliest observance of fetal movement (roughly around 18 weeks), was signifi cant because the medieval church believed fetal movement was a sign that a fetus had acquired its soul. 1 Second, the treatises highlighted the formation of the fetus, thought to have occurred some weeks earlier. Tampering with
According to medieval common law, assault against a pregnant woman causing miscarriage after the fi rst trimester was homicide. Some scholars have argued, however, that in practice English jurors refused to acknowledge assaults of this nature as homicide. The underlying argument is that because abortion by assault is a crime against women, male jurors were loath to impose the death penalty. A reexamination of the material notes that while conviction rates for assault on pregnant women were low, the English believed such assaults were felonies. Moreover, the role played by husbands as plaintiffs makes it clear that this was not merely a women's issue. Abortion by assault was never an easy judgment for jurors to deliver. In particular, the medical expertise required to pass judgment on such a case presented jurors with diffi culties that may have prevented conviction of abortion by assault in many cases. T he recent signing of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act by President George W. Bush, passed by the Senate in March 2004 and signed into law on 1 April of the same year, in many ways is a dramatic departure from current western positions on the legal rights of a fetus. Since the famed American case of Roe v. Wade, law courts throughout the western world have generally refused to acknowledge a fetus as a separate legal entity capable of being victimized. The passage of this bill and its ratifi cation by Bush both endows fetuses with legal life and champions their human rights. Thus, under federal law the death of a fetus, at any stage of development, resulting from a violent attack, is now recognized as homicide. It should be acknowledged, however, that this is not the fi rst time western law has claimed rights for the unborn. As early as the Middle Ages, English common law courts adopted a harsh stance on the issue of abortion by assault, although it is important to note that medieval Englishmen defi ned abortion somewhat differently than we do today. Medieval legal treatises emphasized two pivotal moments. First, the quickening, meaning the earliest observance of fetal movement (roughly around 18 weeks), was signifi cant because the medieval church believed fetal movement was a sign that a fetus had acquired its soul. 1 Second, the treatises highlighted the formation of the fetus, thought to have occurred some weeks earlier. Tampering with
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.