2021
DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caliata: An Indigenous Community in Ecuador Offers Lessons on Food Sovereignty and Sustainable Diets

Abstract: Background To achieve a healthy sustainable food system globally, it is imperative to understand how local food systems can provide healthy and sustainable conditions. Objective To explore, through the indigenous community of Caliata in the Ecuadorian highlands, the factors that support or hinder sustainable Andean food systems. Methods We designed a particip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristics of included studies are summarised in Table 2. Indigenous food sovereignty was assessed mostly in Canada (n = 13), 12,20,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] followed by United States of America (n = 8), 23,26,[37][38][39][40][41][42] India (n = 3), 25,43,44 Ecuador (n = 3), 24,45,46 Australia (n = 2), 47,48 and one study from Uganda, 49,50 South Africa, 51 China, 21 and Namibia respectively. 52 Seven studies used validated frameworks, with the most frequent being the socioecological model (n = 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Characteristics of included studies are summarised in Table 2. Indigenous food sovereignty was assessed mostly in Canada (n = 13), 12,20,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] followed by United States of America (n = 8), 23,26,[37][38][39][40][41][42] India (n = 3), 25,43,44 Ecuador (n = 3), 24,45,46 Australia (n = 2), 47,48 and one study from Uganda, 49,50 South Africa, 51 China, 21 and Namibia respectively. 52 Seven studies used validated frameworks, with the most frequent being the socioecological model (n = 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,33,38 The most frequent assessment method was interviews (n = 29), 12,21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][32][33][34][36][37][38][39]45,[47][48][49][50][51][52] followed by focus groups and meetings (n = 23). 12,24,[27][28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][46][47][48][50][51][52] The most frequently used tool was the Traditional Food Frequency Questionnaire (n = 7), 20,[29][30][31]34,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, increasingly homogenized and global food systems enable populations to disassociate from local environments and more easily access ultra-processed and evolutionarily novel food items. In some Indigenous communities today, traditional diets have been recognized for environmental sustainability, though unfortunately, substantial shifts away from these patterns are evident in these populations as well [ 88 , 89 ]. Two studies in the review were from island communities and illustrative of ecosystem synchrony.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variable was obtained from responses on child dietary intake from a validated 24-hour Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), which is based on a comprehensive list of foods with their standardised serving/portion sizes identified from extensive formative research (29) , our previous studies in young children living in the Cotopaxi region using FFQ (24) and national studies examining child diets using 24-hour recalls in Ecuador (30) . Intake frequency was based on different food categories meeting the NOVA classification of UPF specifically adapted for Ecuador's context (31,32) . The NOVA classification establishes four categories: unprocessed or minimally processed; culinary ingredients; processed and ultra-processed (12) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%