2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-020-01485-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating analytical ultracentrifuges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum entropy regularization with p = 0.9 was applied. Scaling factors for transformation of experimental s -values to the reference values in water at 20 °C were calculated with the software SEDNTERP 3.0.3, kindly provided by Dr John Philo, after AUC calibration ( 26 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum entropy regularization with p = 0.9 was applied. Scaling factors for transformation of experimental s -values to the reference values in water at 20 °C were calculated with the software SEDNTERP 3.0.3, kindly provided by Dr John Philo, after AUC calibration ( 26 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this same shift is found for a second Biogen Optima and has been observed on other Optima instruments (unpublished information), suggesting there is a common origin for the problem. Two possibilities are: 1) differences in radial calibration [12][13][14] or 2) differences in how ω 2 t is calculated between these two detectors. At present, we do not know which detector provides more accurate S values, but Optima users should be aware of and test for this possibility.…”
Section: Technical Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working group entitled 'Optimization of data quality' has been particularly popular and has focussed primarily on helping cross-laboratory teams (i) develop standard samples (Birchenough et al 2021) which will be used in future training workshops and benchmarking studies, (ii) establish standard operating procedures (SOP's), (iii) carry out benchmarking studies and iv) define procedures for the optimisation of sample quality. The network has already generated SOP's across many instruments and methods, including enzymatic Activity inhibition assays (Smirnovienė et al 2021), calibration of analytical ultracentrifuges (Zhao et al 2021), isothermal titration calorimetry (Bastos and Velazquez-Campoy 2021), fluorescent thermal shift assays (Kazlauskas et al 2021), microscale thermophoresis (MST) experiments (Sedivy 2021), Switchsense DRX instruments (Müller-Landau and Fernandez Varela 2021) and mass photometry (Wu and Piszczek 2021). There have been two extremely successful benchmarking studies, one using the standard samples developed by the network examining the reproducibility and accuracy of MST instrumentation (López-Méndez et al 2021a) and a multi-laboratory benchmark of ITC instrumentation using EDTA metal chelation (Velazquez-Campoy et al 2021).…”
Section: Scientific Outputs Of the Mobieu Cost Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%