What if We Could Reimagine Copyright? 2017
DOI: 10.22459/wiwcrc.01.2017.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating copyright for creators and consumers: Promoting distributive justice and Ubuntu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-binary nature of the debate on intellectual property calls for the development of the incentive to innovate theory, and for it to be expanded to reflect the epistemic inquiries of the subaltern. For example, the incentive theory falls short in justifying intellectual property when it comes to works of art that are created for the sake of art and not primarily because of the motivation that the incentive theory offers (Ncube 2017). There are seven attributes that make creative industries unique insofar as the incentive rationale is concerned, and the so-called 'starving artist' argument points to intrinsic motivation to create art instead of financial motivation (Searle & Brassell 2000).…”
Section: Intellectual Property Scholars Should Not Insist On Using the Narrow Lens Of Economic Interests To Construct A Complete Vision Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-binary nature of the debate on intellectual property calls for the development of the incentive to innovate theory, and for it to be expanded to reflect the epistemic inquiries of the subaltern. For example, the incentive theory falls short in justifying intellectual property when it comes to works of art that are created for the sake of art and not primarily because of the motivation that the incentive theory offers (Ncube 2017). There are seven attributes that make creative industries unique insofar as the incentive rationale is concerned, and the so-called 'starving artist' argument points to intrinsic motivation to create art instead of financial motivation (Searle & Brassell 2000).…”
Section: Intellectual Property Scholars Should Not Insist On Using the Narrow Lens Of Economic Interests To Construct A Complete Vision Omentioning
confidence: 99%