2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w13-1637-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating Photogrammetric Airborne Camera Systems With Diffractive Optical Elements

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> This paper presents a laboratory approach for geometric calibration of airborne camera systems. The setup uses an incoming laser beam, which is split by Diffractive Optical Elements (DOE) into a number of beams with precisely-known propagation directions. Each point of the diffraction pattern represents a point at infinity and is invariant against translation. A single image is sufficient to allow a complete camera calibration in accordance with classical camera … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The imaging model, which contains the calibration parameters of the camera, including the optical distortion, is iteratively optimized on the basis of an image. Dahlke et al (2019) show that this method leads to similar good results as a 3D test field calibration. A disadvantage of this approach, however, is that the distortion parameters and the focal length cannot be decorrelated since only one image is used.…”
Section: Laboratory Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The imaging model, which contains the calibration parameters of the camera, including the optical distortion, is iteratively optimized on the basis of an image. Dahlke et al (2019) show that this method leads to similar good results as a 3D test field calibration. A disadvantage of this approach, however, is that the distortion parameters and the focal length cannot be decorrelated since only one image is used.…”
Section: Laboratory Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The camera was calibrated at the Institute for Optical Sensor Systems, DLR, Berlin before the first flight. A method using optical diffraction (DOE, diffractive optical elements) was used, see (Bauer et al, 2008) and (Dahlke et al, 2019). In this calibration, a geometrically highly precisely defined pattern created by a laser and a diffraction unit is recorded by the camera behind a collimator.…”
Section: Laboratory Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 micrometers, i.e., 1.5 pixels. As described in [1], the camera was pre-calibrated in the lab of DLR (Institute of Optical Sensor Systems) applying the diffractive optical elements (DOE) method [8]. The results of [1] suggest that the final results of the bundle block adjustment do not differ significantly between different camera calibration scenarios.…”
Section: Camera Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tool chain deriving 3D models from aerial imagery benefits greatly from better image quality especially from better spatial resolution [8]. It is therefore advantageous to have knowledge of the spatial resolution of a specific sensor-lens combination in order to quantify later uncertainties (e.g., of bundle block adjustment or dense image matching).…”
Section: Image Quality and Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are standard in use as diffusers [ 7 ], beam splitters [ 8 ], beam samplers [ 9 ], beam shapers [ 10 ], axicons [ 11 ], vortex phase plates [ 12 ], etc. Lately, they have also found application in products such as 3D displays [ 13 ], consumer electronics [ 14 ], VR/AR/MR displays [ 15 ], automotive vehicles [ 16 ], and in fields such as robotics [ 17 ] or medically-required and elective surgery [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%