Rethinking Fiscal Policy After the Crisis 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316675861.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating the Cost of Defaulting in Models of Sovereign Defaults

Abstract: This paper develops a DSGE model of sovereign default and contagion for small open economies that have common risk averse international investors. The financial links generated by these investors explain the endogenous determination of credit limits, capital flows, and the risk premium in sovereign bond prices. In equilibrium, these variables are a function of both an economy's own fundamentals and the fundamentals of other economies. The model is able to replicate both the Wealth and Portfolio Recomposition c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a key parameter determining the government's willingness to tolerate consumption fluctuations and thus the optimal cyclicality of fiscal policy. Overall, we use the simulations to calibrate the value of four parameters: the values for the default cost d 0 and d 1 mainly determine the average debt and spread levels (Hatchondo and Martinez, 2017), σ U mainly determines the spread volatility, and γ is determined mainly by the consumption-volatility target.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a key parameter determining the government's willingness to tolerate consumption fluctuations and thus the optimal cyclicality of fiscal policy. Overall, we use the simulations to calibrate the value of four parameters: the values for the default cost d 0 and d 1 mainly determine the average debt and spread levels (Hatchondo and Martinez, 2017), σ U mainly determines the spread volatility, and γ is determined mainly by the consumption-volatility target.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose these four parameters to match four targets in the data: (i) a public debt-to-income ratio of 43.5 percent (IMF Fiscal Affairs Department Historical Public Debt database), (ii) a mean level of spreads of 240 basis points, (iii) a spread volatility of 100 basis points, and (iv) a volatility of consumption relative to output equal to one. The values for the default cost d 0 and d 1 mainly determine the average debt and spread levels (Hatchondo and Martinez, 2017), σ U mainly determines the spread volatility, and γ is determined mainly by the consumption-volatility target.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%