2013
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.47a1001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating Vegetation Cover and Grassland Pollen Assemblages in the Flint Hills of Kansas, USA

Abstract:

Grassland cover and composition respond to climate and have undoubtedly changed during the Holocene, but quantitative reconstructions from fossil pollen have been vague about spatial scale and taxon-specific cover. Here, we estimate the relevant source area of pollen for sedimentary basins approximately 50 m in radius, and we report pollen productivity estimates for 12 plant t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pollen records can help define the dominant vegetation cover in forests and can also be used to define temporal transitions from forested to nonforested environments, no consensus exists on the dominance of grassland vegetation cover based on pollen assemblages, or the percentage of Non‐Arboreal Pollen (NAP) types. Even in grass‐dominated landscapes, pollen productivity is higher for woody taxa than herbaceous taxa due to differences in dispersal (i.e., by wind rather than insects) (Commerford, McLauchlan, & Sugita, ). In addition, NAP in vegetation history studies is typically considered to be part of the forest understory, or as the herbaceous vegetation around the depositional environment.…”
Section: Grassland Biomes and Fire History Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although pollen records can help define the dominant vegetation cover in forests and can also be used to define temporal transitions from forested to nonforested environments, no consensus exists on the dominance of grassland vegetation cover based on pollen assemblages, or the percentage of Non‐Arboreal Pollen (NAP) types. Even in grass‐dominated landscapes, pollen productivity is higher for woody taxa than herbaceous taxa due to differences in dispersal (i.e., by wind rather than insects) (Commerford, McLauchlan, & Sugita, ). In addition, NAP in vegetation history studies is typically considered to be part of the forest understory, or as the herbaceous vegetation around the depositional environment.…”
Section: Grassland Biomes and Fire History Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies designed to calibrate pollen assemblages to vegetation abundance and landscape structure (Commerford et al., ; Sugita, , ; Tauber, ) have been conducted in forests. Such studies need to be extended to grassland environments, by comparison of subsurface pollen assemblages with present‐day grassland ecosystems as defined by Dixon et al.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RPP are available in e.g. northern America for tree taxa (Calcote 1995) and some herb taxa (Commerford et al 2013), and in southern Africa for a few savanna taxa (Duffin and Bunting 2007). A relatively large number of RPP studies were conducted recently in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AP/NAP pollen ratio is not linearly transferrable to vegetation cover because plant species vary in pollen productivity [38]. However, the ratio can be used as a relative metric of woody versus herbaceous vegetation across the sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%