2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2013.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of a tire–snow interaction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The artificial viscosity of the SPH particles is combined with the momentum equation in the form of a passive term to enhance the numerical simulation stability. 12 The term p ij which represents the artificial viscosity is introduced into equation 1as indicated in equation (6). In addition, Monaghan indicated that the artificial viscosity can conserve the total linear and angular momenta 3…”
Section: Sph Snow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The artificial viscosity of the SPH particles is combined with the momentum equation in the form of a passive term to enhance the numerical simulation stability. 12 The term p ij which represents the artificial viscosity is introduced into equation 1as indicated in equation (6). In addition, Monaghan indicated that the artificial viscosity can conserve the total linear and angular momenta 3…”
Section: Sph Snow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Choi did not attempt to compute the rolling resistance but rather the traction. One year later, Lee 6 numerically modelled and calibrated a tyre-snow interaction model. The Gaussian maximum likehood method was used to determine the snow mechanical properties, in addition to the snow depth and the coefficient of friction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi et al [13] employed a Lagrange-based FEM and the finite volume method (abbreviated as FVM) to simulate the interaction between tires and snow, and obtained simulation results that were consistent with the experimental results. However, the rolling resistance was not considered in the model; thus, Lee et al [14] improved the model by using the Gaussian great likelihood method to determine the mechanical properties of snow in addition to considering the snow depth and friction coefficients to achieve good results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%