2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0978-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of lake surface temperature simulations with the coupled WRF-lake model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
156
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
156
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This lake model is taken from CLM version 4.5 (Subin et al, 2012;Oleson et al, 2013) with some modifications by Gu et al (2015) as discussed further below. Although a version of CLM4 was available as an LSM option within WRF version 3.5, the lake model in CLM4 was disabled in WRF (Table 1).…”
Section: Use Of a Coupled Lake Model Within An Rcmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This lake model is taken from CLM version 4.5 (Subin et al, 2012;Oleson et al, 2013) with some modifications by Gu et al (2015) as discussed further below. Although a version of CLM4 was available as an LSM option within WRF version 3.5, the lake model in CLM4 was disabled in WRF (Table 1).…”
Section: Use Of a Coupled Lake Model Within An Rcmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In WRF version 3.6, CLM's Hostetler-based lake model can be applied by using horizontally varying lake depths (which are available in WPS version 3.6) or a uniform lake depth can be assigned to all lakes at runtime. Gu et al (2015) demonstrated WRF-CLM's performance in the Great Lakes region using a previous version of this model configuration (WRF 3.2 and CLM 3.5) to simulate a 16-month period from 2001 to 2002 at 10 km grid spacing. It was shown that the lake model simulated LSTs well in Lake Erie but generated large biases in LSTs when compared to buoy observations in Lake Superior.…”
Section: Use Of a Coupled Lake Model Within An Rcmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations