1992
DOI: 10.2307/2290268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
757
0
14

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(777 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
757
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Overall characteristics of patients seeking access to each of the three types of GP and results reported here were based on weighted data. Distributions were compared using χ 2 and Fisher tests for categorical variables and Student and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Overall characteristics of patients seeking access to each of the three types of GP and results reported here were based on weighted data. Distributions were compared using χ 2 and Fisher tests for categorical variables and Student and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been performed mostly to improve the accuracy in stem volume and assortments (see Kangas and Maltamo 2000a;Kangas and Maltamo 2002;Mabvirura et al 2002). Note that the calibration estimation presented by Deville and Särndal (1992) necessitates abandoning the smooth shape of the original distribution function. Thus, calibration functions enable mimicking of the irregularities (e.g., bi-or multimodality) of the observed distributions (see Kangas and Maltamo 2000a;Kangas and Maltamo 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular measure is case 2 from Deville and Sarndal [7], i,jρij{gijlog(gij)(gij1)}, also recognizable as the deviance function from Poisson regression. Solving this optimization problem is equivalent to solving ijexp(λTrij)ρijrij=i,jrij for λ.…”
Section: Estimating Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency of the estimator trueθ^ readily follows from the fact that the estimating function (5) is asymptotically unbiased, which is partially due to the fact that λ^=Optrue(1Ntrue) [7]. To find the asymptotic variance of the estimator, we first work out the asymptotic variance of U ( θ 0 ).…”
Section: Large Sample Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation