2014
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2013.0141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of antenna pattern and phase errors of a cross‐loop/monopole antenna array in high‐frequency surface wave radars

Abstract: High-frequency surface wave radar has now been widely used as a regular instrument in remote sensing of sea states. To solve the contradiction of the array pattern beamwidth and array aperture, multiple cross-loop/monopole (CM) antennas are used as sub-arrays to form a uniform linear array, which is called the CM-uniform linear array (ULA). Adaptive beamforming via virtual interferences is used to synthesize the desired pattern and a half beamwidth of about 20°is achieved by a two-unit CM-ULA with a spacing of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the above types of estimation methods have good DOA estimation performances, they depend on the ideal array manifold, while in practical application scenarios, array manifolds are often affected by unknown gain-phase errors. Without array manifold calibration, the performance of DOA estimation may be greatly degraded [22]. Therefore, the study of DOA estimation methods with array gain-phase errors has theoretical significance and practical value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the above types of estimation methods have good DOA estimation performances, they depend on the ideal array manifold, while in practical application scenarios, array manifolds are often affected by unknown gain-phase errors. Without array manifold calibration, the performance of DOA estimation may be greatly degraded [22]. Therefore, the study of DOA estimation methods with array gain-phase errors has theoretical significance and practical value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to cover all interested angles, they require a large amount of ship echoes, which usually take several days or longer to record. Note that the sea echoes already contain signals from all directions, so some antenna pattern estimation/calibration methods using sea echoes have been proposed [25][26][27][28]. As a kind of passive calibration, these methods employ different iterative algorithms and cost functions to calibrate the APD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In STAP, the jamming power that injects into the tracking loop is minimised to the noise level so that it no longer affects the performance of receiver, and a typical N elements M taps array can suppress NM ‐1 jamming signals. However, although STAP is very effective in anti‐jamming application, the unwanted carrier phase bias would be induced because of several factors when applying STAP, including the characteristics of antennas [4], the mismatch of front‐end channels [5], the space‐time filtering [6], and so on. It has been analysed that the positioning error that caused by the bias of STAP can be several metres, and the carrier phase positioning would be invalid as well, which may significantly degrade the performance of navigation signals [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%