Two propositions relating to the interpretation of size-exclusion
chromatograms (SEC) of coal-derived materials in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) have been examined.
These were (i) that
signal peaks showing up at exclusion (short retention time) limits of
SEC columns are due to
sample polarity alone and (ii) that shifts in SEC
chromatograms to longer retention times,
observed upon addition of LiBr to the eluent (NMP), are due to
dissipation of ionic binding forces,
causing disaggregation of polar clusters that would otherwise have
appeared at retention times
appropriate to larger molecular masses. In our experiments,
effects due to polarity and molecular
mass have been isolated by using two nonpolar samples (a naphthalene
mesophase pitch and a
mixture of fullerenes). In the presence of LiBr, precipitation of
solute out of solution and shifts
of chromatograms to longer retention times, unrelated to sample
polarity, have been observed.
A partial breakdown of the size exclusion mechanism was identified
by the observed extension
of chromatograms beyond the permeation limit of the column, similar to
those observed when
using eluents of insufficient solvent strength (e.g., THF, chloroform).
Dosing LiBr into NMP
sharply reduces the solvent power of NMP for coal-derived solutes.
In the absence of LiBr, SEC
chromatograms of the fullerene mixture, the naphthalene mesophase
pitch, and its fractions
separated by planar chromatography clearly showed significant signal
under the “excluded” peak,
entirely due to nonpolar material. The damage caused to the SEC
column arising from
precipitation of sample, in the presence of LiBr, was not permanent as
had originally been feared.
The balance of the evidence suggests that polarity of some
molecules may cause shifts in their
elution times to shorter values (larger apparent molecular masses) and
that these may overlap
with signal from large molecular mass material.