Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2006.1641723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of multi-axis MEMS force sensors using the shape from motion method

Abstract: -This paper presents a new design of a two-axis MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) capacitive force sensor with strict linearity and a new sensor calibration method for micro-sensors. Precise calibration of multi-axis micro force sensors is difficult for several reasons, including the need to apply many known force vectors at precise orientations at the micro force scale, and the risk of damaging the small, fragile MEMS device. In this paper the shape from motion method is introduced for micro force sensors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The device hyperplane characterization method guarantees an accuracy which is similar to that achievable using traditional least-squares methods and is time effective, requiring, like the shape from motion method, only a few precise force measurements. This method is inspired by the shape from motion method [3,5] and collaborative calibration [14] since it reduces the burden of data collection and considers sensor calibration as an output focused problem. Furthermore, according to the kind of sensor, it may require a simpler test bench with respect to shape from motion, given that there is no need for any geometrical bond for applied forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The device hyperplane characterization method guarantees an accuracy which is similar to that achievable using traditional least-squares methods and is time effective, requiring, like the shape from motion method, only a few precise force measurements. This method is inspired by the shape from motion method [3,5] and collaborative calibration [14] since it reduces the burden of data collection and considers sensor calibration as an output focused problem. Furthermore, according to the kind of sensor, it may require a simpler test bench with respect to shape from motion, given that there is no need for any geometrical bond for applied forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, since the sensor is redundant, fractional changes in resistance vectors have a constraint because they ideally belong to a hyperplane of R 4 . Those two opposite points of view give the two linear relations (4) and (5), where B is a uniquely determined 4 × 3 matrix (the aim is to evaluate it, according to a certain optimum criterion), and A is a 3 × 4 one (A matrix can be chosen in various suitable ways, as explained in section 3.3.3):…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haitjema et al, Tibrewala et al and Dai et al developed MEMS-type piezoresistive probe [7][8][9]. And, some calibration methods have also been proposed for 3-DOF force sensor based CMM probes [10][11][12]. These probes used highly sensitive 3-DOF force sensors (or displacement sensors) for improving triggering sensitivity to minimize the pretravel and the anisotropic sensitivity errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%