1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.1150021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers

Abstract: A method to determine the spring constant of a rectangular atomic force microscope cantilever is proposed that relies solely on the measurement of the resonant frequency and quality factor of the cantilever in fluid (typically air), and knowledge of its plan view dimensions. This method gives very good accuracy and improves upon the previous formulation by Sader et al. [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 3789 (1995)] which, unlike the present method, requires knowledge of both the cantilever density and thickness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,512
1
12

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,923 publications
(1,535 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
1,512
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The spring constants of the AFM cantilevers were determined by the added mass method, whereby the shift of the resonance frequency was investigated as a function of the added mass of attached tungsten particles, which were in the size range of 5-20 mm. 32 The resulting values in the range of 0.03-0.11 N m À1 were within 30% of the values determined by analyzing the thermal fluctuations in air 33 or the ones obtained with procedure proposed by Sader et al, 34 which uses properties of the cantilever and the surrounding medium. The deviations between the values obtained by the different methods are probably due to the finite spot size of the laser beam on the cantilever, which leads to additional contributions from the higher order harmonics.…”
Section: Direct Force Measurementssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The spring constants of the AFM cantilevers were determined by the added mass method, whereby the shift of the resonance frequency was investigated as a function of the added mass of attached tungsten particles, which were in the size range of 5-20 mm. 32 The resulting values in the range of 0.03-0.11 N m À1 were within 30% of the values determined by analyzing the thermal fluctuations in air 33 or the ones obtained with procedure proposed by Sader et al, 34 which uses properties of the cantilever and the surrounding medium. The deviations between the values obtained by the different methods are probably due to the finite spot size of the laser beam on the cantilever, which leads to additional contributions from the higher order harmonics.…”
Section: Direct Force Measurementssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The gradient of the linear region of the retracted signal was measured and the mean value of the five gradients set as the cantilever InvOLS. Finally, the cantilever spring constant was determined using the thermal noise method (Sader et al, 1999). Spring constants were typically around 8 N/m and similar to the values of 9 N/m given by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Cantilever-based Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before gluing the cellulose microparticles, the spring constants of the cantilevers were determined from the analysis of the cantilever thermal vibrations with the software AFM Tune IT v2.5 (ForceIT, Sweden) and the use of Sader's equations. 47,48 Values of about 0.25 N/m and 25 1.9×10 -9 Nm/rad were obtained for the normal and lateral spring constants, respectively. CMC-g-PEG was adsorbed either on NFC film, on the cellulose colloidal probe or on both, from 100 mg/L polymer solution at pH 4.5 overnight, followed by rinsing with deionized water and drying under nitrogen flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%