2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of visual model for space manipulator with a hybrid LM–GA algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The setting of parameters were: initial population size 60, and the number of iterations used were 100, 1000 and 5000; the crossover rate was 0.7; the mutation rate 0.2; the range of weighted adjustment was from 0.01 to the end of each iteration by increasing the value by 0.005 to 0.99 to the end. Each of the optimal parameter values of the weighted output were substituted into formula (17) and (18), to obtain the Pareto-optimal solution, as shown in Figure 5, Figure 6, and Figure 7. Figure 5 shows that the pattern of GA in the Pareto optimal solutions after 100 iterations is very messy while the HTGA pattern is getting stable.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The setting of parameters were: initial population size 60, and the number of iterations used were 100, 1000 and 5000; the crossover rate was 0.7; the mutation rate 0.2; the range of weighted adjustment was from 0.01 to the end of each iteration by increasing the value by 0.005 to 0.99 to the end. Each of the optimal parameter values of the weighted output were substituted into formula (17) and (18), to obtain the Pareto-optimal solution, as shown in Figure 5, Figure 6, and Figure 7. Figure 5 shows that the pattern of GA in the Pareto optimal solutions after 100 iterations is very messy while the HTGA pattern is getting stable.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization issue is treated under nonlinear constraint and PSO-GA gave better results that either method alone. The position of a space manipulator was investigated by Jiang and Wang [18] who used a hybrid LM-GA algorithm, a combination of the Levenberg-Marqurdt algorithm with the Genetic algorithm, to find precise requirements for camera calibration. Their results showed that the hybrid LM-GA gave more precise non-linear camera error reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manually controlled robots equipped with a vision system are mainly used in the environments where it is hard, dangerous or even impossible for a human being to perform necessary actions. The area of application includes medical procedures [14], underwater operations [15], space technologies [16], rescue operations [17] and various industrial applications such as robots on oil platforms [18].…”
Section: Types Of Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palli et al used a robot with an eye-in-hand vision system for underwater operations [29]. Jiang and Wang described a space station robot equipped with two monocular cameras and two stereocameras fixed to a robotic manipulator [16]. One of the stereo cameras was mounted near the gripper and headed in its direction.…”
Section: Locations Of a Vision System In A Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the objective facts of the starting and ending time of the manipulator, they are set as formula (6)…”
Section: Optimal Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%