International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2016 2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2296142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration OGSE for a multichannel radiometer for Mars atmosphere studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specially, if the Sun is in a low relative zenith angle, the direct, circumsolar, and most of the diffuse light will actually be received with a responsivity very close to the nominal (normal incidence) value, making the estimation of the absolute irradiance a very straightforward process. Figure 14, extracted form Jiménez et al (2016), shows this angular dependence: depends on the angle of incidence of the light. For that reason the "equivalent irradiance" of that noise depends on the angle we may suppose in a hypothetical scenario.…”
Section: Sismentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specially, if the Sun is in a low relative zenith angle, the direct, circumsolar, and most of the diffuse light will actually be received with a responsivity very close to the nominal (normal incidence) value, making the estimation of the absolute irradiance a very straightforward process. Figure 14, extracted form Jiménez et al (2016), shows this angular dependence: depends on the angle of incidence of the light. For that reason the "equivalent irradiance" of that noise depends on the angle we may suppose in a hypothetical scenario.…”
Section: Sismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…where the responsivity is less than 5% of that at normal incidence. Details can be found in Jiménez et al (2016).…”
Section: Sismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal incidence responsivity, TRF and spectral response are displayed in Figure 3, whereas the ARF for both the top and lateral detectors is shown in Figure 4. Reference (Jiménez et al, 2016) provides further details on the calibration process. As shown in Figure 4, the FoV of all the detectors extends to negative elevation angles (4.2% of the Top detector ARF lies below the horizon; 3.5% for the lateral ones).…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ARF has been measured for each channel in the laboratory. The angular calibration consists on automatic 2-D angular sample of the solar angles positions (azimuth and zenith angles) under a reference light source [8]. Fig.…”
Section: A Skyline Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%