2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/i2mtc.2018.8409584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration test bench for three-axis accelerometers An accurate and low-cost proposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, it is important to investigate the actual responsiveness and precision of the MEMS sensor accelerometer when subjected to several sudden trajectory variations, characterized by different linear, tangential, and centripetal accelerations. The metrological characterization of the performance of IMU sensors, in static or linear dynamic conditions (as previously studied), may not be representative and accurate enough compared with curvilinear dynamic working conditions with respect to road geometry [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. At present, the sensors and algorithms of AVs are still having trouble identifying road hazards and potential obstacles reasonably expected to be in the driving path [ 48 ], and at present, the legal framework has many regulatory gaps that have to be filled, so it is necessary to provide practical evidence and technical procedures to develop a suitable standardization supporting the manufacturers to ensure that AVs and integrated sensors work correctly [ 49 ].…”
Section: Local Navigation and Positioning Systems: A Brief Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, it is important to investigate the actual responsiveness and precision of the MEMS sensor accelerometer when subjected to several sudden trajectory variations, characterized by different linear, tangential, and centripetal accelerations. The metrological characterization of the performance of IMU sensors, in static or linear dynamic conditions (as previously studied), may not be representative and accurate enough compared with curvilinear dynamic working conditions with respect to road geometry [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. At present, the sensors and algorithms of AVs are still having trouble identifying road hazards and potential obstacles reasonably expected to be in the driving path [ 48 ], and at present, the legal framework has many regulatory gaps that have to be filled, so it is necessary to provide practical evidence and technical procedures to develop a suitable standardization supporting the manufacturers to ensure that AVs and integrated sensors work correctly [ 49 ].…”
Section: Local Navigation and Positioning Systems: A Brief Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. it is necessary to evaluate how much the variability of the sampling frequency affects the uncertainty of determining the sensitivity with the FFT peak method, used in this work; 2. the variability of the sampling frequency does not allow the application of some methods of evaluation of the main and transversal sensitivities in which a point-to-point comparison with the reference accelerations is expected [18]. It is therefore necessary to develop specific methods to deal with this problem properly.…”
Section: Fig 5 Comparison Between Mems Output Acceleration and Refere...mentioning
confidence: 99%